Hi, all. I'm new to Land Cruisers but not new to wheeling. I've wheeled Land ROVERS primarily for the last 20 years. The atmosphere on the 100 series board is eerily familiar to that of the Rover groups. Seems you suffer from the same "how can I fit 35's" malady...
Anyhow...
I'm in the market for a new vehicle. What I love about my Rovers is their flexibility. They at home as a daily driver as they are in driving 2300 miles from NY/NJ to Moab, running Poison Spider Mesa and Pritchett Canyon, then driving the 2300 miles home(yes, I've done that trip twice), to taking the family to VT skiing and having the ability to get a days wheeling in as well. That's what I'm looking for in the LC. As I see it, it's the only viable and capeable option as far as new vehicles are concerned.
So...
Here in the northeast there is only 1 option package available which includes AVS/AHC. My only other options would be finding a new 2005 without AVS/AHC, special order which can take a year, or purchase new in North Carolina or points south as you can get them in the southeast without AHC. So I need to make a decision. I hear the LX guys are happy with the system and the added bonus of an easy lift in nice, however experience and instinct tell me to keep it simple.
I guess my question is this. I've read the faq's and searched but haven't really found the answer I've been looking for. How dependable has the AHC setup been in the long run and through hard use? Whichever truck I get will be on 33's the day I take delivery and, knowing me, will be on 35's shortly thereafter. Troubleshooting a flakey hydro assist system on the trail is not something I'd care to experience. Your input is greatly appreciated.
I can turn a wrench, weld, and I'm not afraid to sawzall. I hope to be a contributor to this board.
Kneel
Anyhow...
I'm in the market for a new vehicle. What I love about my Rovers is their flexibility. They at home as a daily driver as they are in driving 2300 miles from NY/NJ to Moab, running Poison Spider Mesa and Pritchett Canyon, then driving the 2300 miles home(yes, I've done that trip twice), to taking the family to VT skiing and having the ability to get a days wheeling in as well. That's what I'm looking for in the LC. As I see it, it's the only viable and capeable option as far as new vehicles are concerned.
So...
Here in the northeast there is only 1 option package available which includes AVS/AHC. My only other options would be finding a new 2005 without AVS/AHC, special order which can take a year, or purchase new in North Carolina or points south as you can get them in the southeast without AHC. So I need to make a decision. I hear the LX guys are happy with the system and the added bonus of an easy lift in nice, however experience and instinct tell me to keep it simple.
I guess my question is this. I've read the faq's and searched but haven't really found the answer I've been looking for. How dependable has the AHC setup been in the long run and through hard use? Whichever truck I get will be on 33's the day I take delivery and, knowing me, will be on 35's shortly thereafter. Troubleshooting a flakey hydro assist system on the trail is not something I'd care to experience. Your input is greatly appreciated.
I can turn a wrench, weld, and I'm not afraid to sawzall. I hope to be a contributor to this board.

Kneel