4Runner would have at least been closer to being accurate but there's literally a dictionary full of all sort of words that could have been used without whoring out the premier brand name and the legacy it earned.
That is nearly a 20 year old engine. With 2 more cylinders and no battery for a hybrid drivetrain and they are marginally worse.
Why are you impressed with a 4 cyl hybrid getting 3-4 more mpg than your 20 year old outdated larger engine?
The sequoia trd pro is an even bigger rolling brick with more aggressive tires, heavier, lifted, and a bigger engine and it gets 19/22. Something is really off about these numbers.
"Land Cruiser has received an EPA-estimated 23 MPG combined rating which is a higher combined MPG rating than any previous iteration."
23 MPG seems poor for a 2.4 liter engine.