TRD Pro Bilstein Shocks (1 Viewer)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

6/9, latest update from Taryn @ Bilstein who continues to be awesome:

"The 5160’s should be something we could revalve in house, but it might be cost prohibitive compared with the price of the original shocks. Revalve service on a Bilstein shock is 127.50 each in our service center, which they also have a multiweek lead time now with current orders. But revalve on these would have to be something either done by Bilstein or one of our dealers, just because you do need a special hydraulic machine to open these non Schrader valve style shocks safely.

Our other shock series like 7100 and 8125 series are end user rebuildable because they do have a Schrader valve allowing a user to safely release the gas pressure before opening the shock to make changes. But 7100 and 8125 only come in eye to eye mounting and specific lengths.

You may want to reach out to our service center in California if you really were interested in trying to purchase one part number and having it sent in to be revalved custom. Though I’ll caution you they may not be able to provide much guidance on using one shock on another vehicle, as that’s a bit taboo just because we don’t want to say something will work that we can’t be sure of and have the vehicle damaged or the ride quality be poor. But it’s certainly a customer’s right to send in a shock and ask it be revalved, if they’re doing something custom and it is what they want to do. It just then falls on the customer to make sure the mounts will also fit properly, the extended and collapsed lengths will be correct for their custom project, and the shock will still pair well with the springs being used."

So.... By my math, here's what we need:

1x Bilstein 6112 part # 46-206084 - This is the Tundra part, the coilovers come as a pair - $649.99 on 4wheelparts
2x Bilstein 5160 part # 25-227611 - This is the FJ/4Runner part, they come as singles - $176.99 each (353.98 for the pair) on 4wheelparts
1x SPC 200 Series Upper Control Arms, part # 25465 - These come as a pair - $577.00 from Slee and others
1x Old Man Emu 2721, 2722, or 2723? Spring Set - These come as a pair - $214.70 on Amazon
2x Bilstein re-valving of the FJ 5160s to 255/70 or 270/78 - $127.50 each - $255 for the pair

Running total:
+$1268.97 on the Bilstein shocks + revalving (4wheelparts often has sales on these - can frequently save $100+ on this price)
+$791.70 on SPC UCAs + OME springs
------------
$2060.67 parts total (before any sales)

Are there any other pieces we need in order to do this? Assuming $500-800 labor for install + alignment?

Seems like an all-Bilstein setup is doable for ~$2500 installed and certainly less than $3k. That's at least $1600-$2100 cheaper than a BP-51 setup.

If BP-51s are among the best, are the BP-51s $1600-$2100 better?
 
Something quantitative would be nice? Comparison tests, same-user testimonials, etc. count for infinitely more than features.

Edit: something quantitative that just caught my eye; BP-51s have a 3 year warranty, but the Bilstein 6112s carry a Limited Lifetime warranty. The 5160s have a 90 day warranty, which sucks, but then again they're $300 each after re-valving ($150-175 a piece if Bilstein releases a heavier-valved part as a stock part # this year) - and you can replace them once or twice before you're at the initial cost of the rear BP-51s, at which point you would be looking at a rebuild, which is also time and money on the BP-51 anyway.
 
Last edited:
I'm not sure saying that because one uses a high tech technology (that has a clunk history) makes something worth twice the price. Maybe if it were... A dollar.

Plus other considerations, do you have capacity to remove shocks, rebuild, and lose your truck during the process... Every what 50k miles or so? A recurring cost and commitment you have to be comfortable with.

I think all those considerations would have to be included along with ride comfort. As well as my truck handles I would LOVE to drive a truck that handles even better, and if it was noticable I'd def pay twice what I paid for my current setup. That said, have been in many trucks and sports cars and not sure it's possible!

More reason we need a schedule truck share where folks can test other suspension setups!
 
well I already have a pair of tundra 6112s up front. Still super stoked about how just on regular notch ill get 2 inches! Trying to confirm the rears seems like going for fj or 4runner 5160 and arb lc200 coils works. before revalving the rear shocks do you think going heavy coils in the rear will minimize the major compression? I also have rear timbren bumpstops ready for install too.
 
Everything I have read indicates stiffer springs can't make up for too-soft of dampening out of a dampener. If the shock can't dampen a bump effectively, the energy from the bump will be transferred to the spring, which will then decompress and try to slam the wheel back into the ground - which again if the shock is also too soft to dampen the rebound effectively - this will happen with excess speed, and this combination (with enough force) can cause wheel hop and all sorts of nasty side effects even in normal highway conditions. I'm not going to try it.
 
Last edited:
well I already have a pair of tundra 6112s up front. Still super stoked about how just on regular notch ill get 2 inches! Trying to confirm the rears seems like going for fj or 4runner 5160 and arb lc200 coils works. before revalving the rear shocks do you think going heavy coils in the rear will minimize the major compression? I also have rear timbren bumpstops ready for install too.

I can tell you from experience that a stiffer spring will not help when using the FJ/4Runner shocks. I was bouncing off the bump stops with the factory springs and the OME springs. They are just way too soft for our trucks.
 
What's different between the Tundra 6112/5160 setup and these?
 
No sure, figure rears are similar but front TRD has the resi. @bjowett
 
Nice, good to know - I looked at those a few weeks ago but didn't see a Tundra SKU yet, are the 8112s thus far just released for the Tacoma?
 
might be an old question or thread but will a rear 100 series shock fit a 200 series?
 
I don't have direct confirmation of this, but it sounds like the top tenon of the 100 series shocks should be the right size for the 200 (maybe for the 100 fronts w/ their torsion bar setup, but fitting the 200 rear?), and then the bottom mount may be the same as well.

Somewhat related: something else I learned yesterday is that the Tundra bottom ring bushing measures 16.4 mm, but the LC's may be configured for a 16.1mm eyelet.... Just amazed at how many little differences there are across these different products and lines, even from Toyota themselves.

One more interesting anecdote to share: I was informed that in the opinion of a Bilstein employee, that the Tundra 6112s were both undervalved and undersprung for use on our 200s versus what may well be released for the LC later this year. The feedback was along the lines of yes they're good as-is, but that they can be better. Sounds like a 750lb spring rate is closer to what they may release, as well as stiffer valving... TBD?

Also was informed that they're testing a new version of the 5160 for 100s with a manifold(? Unsure what this describes - a serviceable valve to change pressure?) that could also potentially apply... Wish all this cool stuff was available! May have to go with another mfr. in the meantime until this stuff hits the market. :(
 
Last edited:
im not sure how the new ones can be better? if the Tundra 6112 give the lc200 2 inches on the lowest coil rate, thats a win. wouldnt that mean that the springs are set heavier or it's build to hold lc200 with heavy front bar?

Maybe the 6112 for lc200 will have a softer ride or such. The tundra set up has to be made for the tow capacity front and rear since the main difference between toyota trucks and suv with same engine and frame is rear spring leaf....

im just guessing at this point. I bought the tundra 6112 just waiting on a good hypothesis on the rear! :D
 
If Bilstein releases the 8112 for the Land Cruise it will be one of the best options available. As Brian mentions, it takes the TRD Pro shock with its triple staging and adds dual stage rebounds control. They have only introduced the 8112 this year and the first truck was the Tacoma due to being such a popular platform. I watched some of the videos from the offroad drive to Las Vegas for SEMA and was thoroughly impressed with what they showed. If there is a sock to wait for, these will be it. The multi staging really makes the shock shine.

You have some good information that Bilstein has shared with you, if they are planning on installing a 750lb spring for a 200, it goes to show that the Turnda TRD Pro shock is certainly under sprung for a Land Cruiser at 650lb. Typically the mid travel shock vendors have provided Tundra owners with either a 700lb spring for crew max and built trucks that plan on taking big hits ore 600lb spring for lighter Tundras that require excessive cranking to get the lift people want.

Thank you to Brian, I am the proud owner of TRD Pro shocks, and these things handle when pushed. I really appreciate learning in this thread that Bilstein rebuilds shocks without the charging port by installing an their special hydraulic machine. Many folks over on the Tundra Forums bash the Pro shocks for not being rebuildable. This is simply not the case.
 
One more thing I forgot to mention: I was told that the manufacturing processes on the 5160s had changed recently, and neither the top tenon/eyelet can be removed, nor can a newer 5160 be revalved. :( Other implication is they can't be serviced, either. Too bad but hopefully other options continue to come to market.
 
Quick update on my part - given the communications I had last week with Bilstein, I continue to be excited to see what they will release - but in the meantime am going to go with parts already tried & true for the LC, and found a great deal on an Icon 2.5 Stage 1 kit. Going to be very interesting to see what the next year or so brings out of the Bilstein catalog for our 200s!
 
Hey maybe ive asked this already but Ill ask again:

would putting a rear coils from a 08-17 sequoia give a minor lift or improved rear weight handling capabilities? I know that the gross vehicle weight on a sequoia is 7100 pounds. Definitely heavier than our 200 series. Does that do anything?
 
GVWR on a 200 is almost 7300 lbs. Curb is 5800-6100 depending on the year and model (LX are ~200 lbs heavier on average.)

What does a Sequoia weigh?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom