Radflo 2.5" Remote Reservoir Shocks and Total Chaos Upper Control Arms

  • Thread starter Thread starter LT
  • Start date Start date

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

LT

Joined
Apr 8, 2002
Threads
68
Messages
1,626
Location
Portland, OR
Just a couple teaser shots for now but we are in the middle of installing new 100 Series Land Cruiser Radflo shocks that have the extra down travel accompanied with Total Chaos Upper Control Arms. We have also come up with a remote reservoir bracket that will require some minor drilling but is very easy to install. I will update this thread tomorrow once everything is completed.
OMEvsRadflo02.webp
Radflo-TC.webp
 
Last edited:
Are you going to sell everything as a package deal? What is your timeframe on this? Is the pricing comparable to the King's?
 
Nice! Rears too?

So many options!
 
Sweet! Cant wait to see the final updated pics.
 
On a 100 series, what are the pros to going with a 2.5 vs 2.0? I assume its just stronger? Also, would it be a major upgrade to go with the reservoir shocks versus non-reservoir?
 
On a 100 series, what are the pros to going with a 2.5 vs 2.0? I assume its just stronger? Also, would it be a major upgrade to go with the reservoir shocks versus non-reservoir?

More fluid = better heat dissipation. Diameter of the shock is matched to the intended use; unsprung weight can come into play too regarding shock sizing. I never, even after dozens of miles of fast washboard, overheated my 2.0" Fox shocks with remotes.

For our front mount locations the diameter can play a limiting role in the droop/down travel limit too; need to cycle the suspension to determine whether or not this is truly a limitation (with either Carl's or Total Chaos upper arms...).

For the front location you will also need to be sure you have some form of down travel limiter to avoid damaging either the ball joint or spherical bearing (aka "uni-ball"). Preferably internal limiter with the shock and external strap since nylon straps keep stretching with loads applied...

It is important to note mono-tube type shocks will provide a very different feel compared to a dual-tube type shock like OME/OEM. The advantage of a mono-tube type shock (King, Fox, Radflo, et al) especially becomes apparent and valuable for higher speed off-road applications. Whereas, generally speaking, a dual-tube type shock can be better for street applications. Here's some good reading: http://www.pirate4x4.com/tech/billavista/coilovers/Part_1/
 
Last edited:
Alright finished the install today with the rear shocks and the front end buttoned up. With the new Radflo's and Total Chaos UCAs we are able to maximize the front IFS system. Below you will see the cv angle at full droop and if we went anymore the cv shaft would go into bind! The rear shocks we decided to do a piggyback style and with everything flexed out the remote reservoir clears everything. You'll have to place the canister specifically in-between the lower link mount and the sway bar.
Radflo-TC-Complete.webp
Radflo-Rear.webp
OMEvsRadflo04.webp
 
For those who are concerned about the Total Chaos UCA having clearance issues on the frame here is a picture of the arm at full drop with plenty of room to spare. Also attached is the cv angle at full droop.
TC-Clearance.webp
CV Angle.webp
 
Are you going to sell everything as a package deal? What is your timeframe on this? Is the pricing comparable to the King's?

You'll find that Radflo are cheaper than the King shocks and the fit and finish is of equal quality. You can view the different options for Radflo here Radflo Shocks for the 100 Series Land Cruiser We are running a day to day sale of 5% off retail with free shipping in the lower 48 states! Also we are still having our introductory price on the Total Chaos Upper Control Arms Total Chaos UCA's for 100 Series Land Cruiser which we will include free shipping on the UCA's with the purchase of Radflo shocks.

. For our front mount locations the diameter can play a limiting role in the droop/down travel limit too; need to cycle the suspension to determine whether or not this is truly a limitation (with either Carl's or Total Chaos upper arms...).

For the front location you will also need to be sure you have some form of down travel limiter to avoid damaging either the ball joint or spherical bearing (aka "uni-ball"). Preferably internal limiter with the shock and external strap since nylon straps keep stretching with loads applied...

It is important to note mono-tube type shocks will provide a very different feel compared to a dual-tube type shock like OME/OEM. The advantage of a mono-tube type shock (King, Fox, Radflo, et al) especially becomes apparent and valuable for higher speed off-road applications. Whereas, generally speaking, a dual-tube type shock can be better for street applications. Here's some good reading: Pirate4x4.com - The largest off roading website in the world.

The diameter of the shock isn't a limiting factory for either upper control arms. The shock sits back far enough in the shock bucket to be a non issue.

The shock is the limiting factor on all applications. You'll find that the factory shock, OME, Ironman, Radflo, King, Fox, Icon, etc will be limiting the amount of down travel in the front and rear. As soon as you release the shock from it's mount the IFS will continue to droop downwards until the upper control and lower control arm maxes out. That is why we asked for a very specific down travel number to stop before the cv shaft goes into bind. Also these shocks are designed to be the limit strap so to speak but it doesn't hurt to have the extra insurance by using a nylon limiting strap.

We've been selling high performance suspension (wholesale dealer of Icon Vehicle Dynamics, Sway Away, Radflo and Total Chaos) to the FJ Cruiser and Tacoma market for the last 3 years and in our opinion the higher end shocks are hands down better handling on and off road versus a traditional monotube shock. They provide a firmer ride on the road, reduce brake drive, body roll and they react better to different driving conditions. On our FJ Cruiser we removed both sway bars front and rear and it reacts better to normal driving conditions than it did stock with our Icon coilovers and shocks.
 
Last edited:
OK, I am going to place my order for the Radflo 2.5" Remote Reservoir Shocks front and rear and Total Chaos Upper Control Arms. I tried to call a couple of times but havnt gotten any one on the phone. I also sent LT a pm yesterday, but am guessing he is out having fun over the weekend. Does any one know if I go to the site and order the individual components if there is anything additional I need, or am I better waiting until I talk to some one on the phone?
 
Mxndrnks said:
OK, I am going to place my order for the Radflo 2.5" Remote Reservoir Shocks front and rear and Total Chaos Upper Control Arms. I tried to call a couple of times but havnt gotten any one on the phone. I also sent LT a pm yesterday, but am guessing he is out having fun over the weekend. Does any one know if I go to the site and order the individual components if there is anything additional I need, or am I better waiting until I talk to some one on the phone?

Good for you.
 
OK, I am going to place my order for the Radflo 2.5" Remote Reservoir Shocks front and rear and Total Chaos Upper Control Arms. I tried to call a couple of times but havnt gotten any one on the phone. I also sent LT a pm yesterday, but am guessing he is out having fun over the weekend. Does any one know if I go to the site and order the individual components if there is anything additional I need, or am I better waiting until I talk to some one on the phone?

I called and spoke to them personally. Just the way i like to do it. But the website is fine.
 
How would one decide on whether to get the 2.0 or 2.5 / emulsion or remote res?
 
My TC UCA's arrived today. Now if my Radflo's and Timbren's would show up I could get my build done!!! Even at a week the wait is agonizing.... LOL!
 
I didn't see an answer to the question in there, just a "call Metal Tech" response.

Yes, because calling Metal Tech or Radflo would be the best way to determine which would work best for your needs and application. Everyone has different needs and expectations.
 
OMG people, seriously?

petrotk40 posts the question on which radflo shock to purchase. spressomon posts a reply to that question with a link to another thread discussing the radflo shocks. One would logically think the question has already been asked there and thus the link to that thread. I proceed to read the entire thread, and the answer was "call Metal Tech".

Extremely helpful.

YES I know shocks are a per application decision, big surprise. but a simple high level FAQ on the different options would be helpful to steer the conversation in one direction or another. Too much to ask?
 
I believe somewhere on the Metaltech or Radflo website there is an application guide based on use and vehicle weight.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom