Sensitive today Anthony?! 
There generally isn't a downside to getting a shock with a remote nitrogen canister...other than increased cost and another part to find a place to mount under the truck somewhere.
The heavier a vehicle and the faster you want to go generally dictates how much control and/or heat dissipation you need: I.e. 2.0" vs 2.5" vs 3.0" etc.
If most of your driving is less aggressive driving then an emulsion style shock would save you money and offer very good damping for that type of driving and/or road/trail conditions.
The benefit to say a Fox/King/Radflo style shock, emulsion included, is the ability to custom tune the shock valving for your specific needs. Whereas an OME, Monroe, et al, type of shock doesn't offer the ability to tune it much less overhaul it including replacing the shock oil. Shock oil, just like any other lubricant, eventually breaks down and is less effective at what its expected to do/perform.
Obviously this is a very brief synopsis of how one might decide whether they would be better served by an emulsion or possibly something higher performing such as a nitrogen charged shock with remote.
But to be fair, guys like Glenn (Radflo) know more about shocks (and tuning!) and thus much better suited to make the best recommendation than most of us here will ever know...speaking mostly about myself only of course
There generally isn't a downside to getting a shock with a remote nitrogen canister...other than increased cost and another part to find a place to mount under the truck somewhere.
The heavier a vehicle and the faster you want to go generally dictates how much control and/or heat dissipation you need: I.e. 2.0" vs 2.5" vs 3.0" etc.
If most of your driving is less aggressive driving then an emulsion style shock would save you money and offer very good damping for that type of driving and/or road/trail conditions.
The benefit to say a Fox/King/Radflo style shock, emulsion included, is the ability to custom tune the shock valving for your specific needs. Whereas an OME, Monroe, et al, type of shock doesn't offer the ability to tune it much less overhaul it including replacing the shock oil. Shock oil, just like any other lubricant, eventually breaks down and is less effective at what its expected to do/perform.
Obviously this is a very brief synopsis of how one might decide whether they would be better served by an emulsion or possibly something higher performing such as a nitrogen charged shock with remote.
But to be fair, guys like Glenn (Radflo) know more about shocks (and tuning!) and thus much better suited to make the best recommendation than most of us here will ever know...speaking mostly about myself only of course
Poor guy. Buy the most expensive ones.
