Not to get Steve on an engineering soapbox but...
Not every metal has a fatigue limit (as the paper points out). Aluminum is one that can take only a certain number of fatigue cycles, which is why aircraft airframes have a design limit of a certain number of pressurization cycles or in unpressurized aircraft, hours flown. Pistons are made of forged alumimun so in theory they could fail before their intended lifetime with the increased HP/torque from hyped-up forced induction. Granted other engine components would likely fail earlier as as result, but I'm jus sayin.... There's a price you pay for forced induction, one way or the other. You play you pay, eventually...
Not every metal has a fatigue limit (as the paper points out). Aluminum is one that can take only a certain number of fatigue cycles, which is why aircraft airframes have a design limit of a certain number of pressurization cycles or in unpressurized aircraft, hours flown. Pistons are made of forged alumimun so in theory they could fail before their intended lifetime with the increased HP/torque from hyped-up forced induction. Granted other engine components would likely fail earlier as as result, but I'm jus sayin.... There's a price you pay for forced induction, one way or the other. You play you pay, eventually...
In thinking of longevity of the the engine, I'd be more concerned with fatigue. More torque, more stress.
Here's a somewhat technical paper on Fatigue.
"The significance of the fatigue limit is that if the material is loaded below this stress, then it will not fail, regardless of the number of times it is loaded."
Okay, it gets a little more than "somewhat" technical toward the bottom, but the point is it's possible that some engine components are stressed below the fatigue limit, but by increasing the engine output you go above that limit.