FrazzledHunter
SILVER Star
So just how DOES one get their towing vehicle "re-rated"? 

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
Your suspicion that payload is not interchangeable to tongue weight is right.
On the topic of projecting tongue weight however, the WD component does indeed project the weight ahead of the rear axle. If we think of the rear axle as the fulcrum (pivot point of a teeter totter), if the weight were not projected ahead of the rear axle, there would be no restoring weight to the front axle.
Lateral forces however, are not.
That's where fancy pivot point projection (PPP) hitches like the Hensley or Propride come in to do the same for lateral forces.
Yeah, it's a real head scratcher, but I'm not sure that's quite right. What you're describing is very much how it "seems" so I'm more than open to the possibility that I'm still just not getting it. It could also be a matter of semantics to some extent. Without a WD hitch, I think the weight on the hitch ball has a long moment arm behind the rear axle and simply counterbalances the weight on the front axle with leverage. WD hitches move some hitch weight over the rear axle, removing the leverage and letting down the front of the tow vehicle, just like the "teeter totter" example you gave. I don't think a WD hitch could ever cause weight on the tow vehicle's front axle to actually "increase" or be higher than it was before the trailer was hooked up. In the attached picture, there are two ways the boy on the left can let is friend down. One is rude (hopping off), and the other is by moving toward the center of the seesaw. Moving toward the center is the WD hitch approach. In either case, the boy on the right doesn't get "heavier." The boy on the left just loses leverage to lift him.
View attachment 2359627
You're not wrong.
Weight, tension, force, doesn't really matter what we call it... applied to a moment arm translates into an opposite force at the other end.
Right that WD bars act upon the hitch ball itself as the the fulcrum. By pulling up on the WD bars at the the trailer tongue, it's projecting force/weight towards the front of the vehicle. (and some back to the trailer axles)
So there's two levers at play, acting upon and balancing the overall system.
From a system point of view, from the perspective of the individual axles on the vehicle, the weight is indeed projected forward. The effect can be measured on a scale. The WD hitch can project weight so far as to fully restore weight taken off the front axle, and beyond. Not recommended as the torsional forces on the vehicle structure would be ridiculous. Especially traversing dips and such. Most vehicles want to be in the area of 50% FALR. Restoring front axle weight in and of itself helps stability as it restores front axle traction and influence upon the articulated vehicle
And here is a snap shot of the Lexus manual for GCWR and how the LX570 and the Airstream sit. The trailer is perfectly level I mean perfect, I put a level in the trailer had to play with the hitch raising and lowering a few times to get it right, but now I feel it’s perfect, steering handling everything is perfect. We live in the mountains so we tow going through crazy grades going from 4,200 feet all the way up to 10,000 feet down 2 lane highways that barely have enough space to fit the air stream in its own lane with its wide body 8 1/2’ stance, going 65 having big rigs pass us the opposite direction literally 2-3’ away, the set up is 100% stable. Again I recommend buying a propride. The picture of the LX in the parking lot is of it in “N” The picture at the lake is the LX in “L”
View attachment 2360459
View attachment 2360460
View attachment 2360461
View attachment 2360462
^You'll love that trailer! I just helped a buddy with a Raptor earlier this year land on that Lance model. I think that floor plan just came out not long ago. He was looking at the 2185 with the only hang up being the completely open floor plan. The divided area between the bedroom and rest of the living area on the 2285 was just the ticket. We've been on a couple camping trips and he loves it. Quality is as good as it gets.
A friend of mine recommended a bunkhouse as a must have option for multiple kids and he was spot on, I have 3 and when they get bigger they enjoy their own little space.Thanks. Yeah we've been on an exhaustive TT search for weeks, and the amenity per pound of Lance in general and the 2285 in particular is just incomparable. Price premium isn't even all that bad. Value proposition is strong with this one.
I'd love to have the 2465, and Lance lists it with their "7000# tow rating" offerings, but its GVWR of 7800 and 29.5' length just intimidate me on long steep grades and such. Their math is that since you're putting 10% of the trailer's weight on the tow vehicle's tongue, you're really only towing 7000lbs of trailer. Is that standard? Seems odd to me that they would put that out. By this math, we could tow 9000lb trailers since ~900lbs of it would be resting on the hitch, leaving an 8100lb trailer. But as we've discussed, the WD hitch is going to send a good 300-400lbs of that back to the trailer axles. It also doesn't seem to account for pushing forces while stopping, but I guess. Still worried about the length.
A friend of mine recommended a bunkhouse as a must have option for multiple kids and he was spot on, I have 3 and when they get bigger they enjoy their own little space.
I gotcha, personally I would skip the sofa and go dinette slide/bunkhouse with a queen “master”, don’t know what lance offers in that range, but there are plenty of travel trailers that have that within towing capacity. I always tell my kids the point of camping is to get outside, they can lounge on a sofa anywhere.Yeah, we've received the same advice from many people, but we also have friends that own the BH lance (2185) who've outgrown it due to seating capacity. It's all trade offs if you're limited on towing capacity. There's no such thing as a BH TT with a sofa and a dinette and a bedroom it makes sense to tow with an LC200, or really any SUV for that matter. You have to go to murphy bed setups to get bunks in a manageable length/weight, and we want a separate room. We'll let them use that space during the day if they want a quiet spot to nap or something. Our kids are also 6mo, 2 and 9, so there's really only one that might want to hide out for the next few years.
I gotcha, personally I would skip the sofa and go dinette slide/bunkhouse with a queen “master”, don’t know what lance offers in that range, but there are plenty of travel trailers that have that within towing capacity. I always tell my kids the point of camping is to get outside, they can lounge on a sofa anywhere.
Ha, the sofa's for me. it's obviously all personal preference, and I appreciate the input. Seems like plenty of Airstream families are making "bunkless" arrangements work. The 2285 dinette converts to a full size bed in 10 seconds. Sofa as well. We probably won't even trust our tiny kids in bunks for years. I agree it's about going outside, but with the true 4 season capability of the Lance, there will undoubtedly be times we're all huddled around inside out of the elements, especially while hunting at 9000' in Sep/Oct. I'd get annoyed fast doing that around a dinette.
Maybe not what your looking for but there are a bunch of FEMA trailers on the auction block for about $4 or $5k in California. A lot of them not even used.
Link is here. Just mentioning it as you're in Cali.
They were there last week, so likely come up again soon as they didn't all sell. Sometimes they have good stuff and other times it's just garbage.
There is also a Canadian company that makes fiberglass trailers with the same Quality and build as Air Stream, except they are fiberglass.
Same price as the Lance ones, you may want to take a look at them.
What area are you hunting?
If it was just my wife and I we'd absolutely go from the 2185 to the 2285. Flipping the sofa to a bed and just having a curtain divider are not ideal. With 3 kids the 2185 triple bunk is really an amazing footprint though.^You'll love that trailer! I just helped a buddy with a Raptor earlier this year land on that Lance model. I think that floor plan just came out not long ago. He was looking at the 2185 with the only hang up being the completely open floor plan. The divided area between the bedroom and rest of the living area on the 2285 was just the ticket. We've been on a couple camping trips and he loves it. Quality is as good as it gets.