I have a '00 Cruiser - wife's mall-crawler. It's currently at 75k miles and has been babied all it's life - no problems what-so-ever.
The TB/WP (90k service) obviously has NOT been done - YET. It's under on mileage, but over on time (over 6 years).
I popped the hood the other day to check the oil and noticed that the serpentine belt has some hairline cracks forming.
I called my local independent shop, and he said I could just have the serpentine changed for now and that he would be comfortable with waiting until 90-100k on the timing belt and the rest of the 90k service.
I've searched, and read on here that even at 90K on some of the older UZJ's, the timing belts still "looked" good.
I'm torn... spend $900+ now to do the service w/ OEM parts, or just replace the serpentine and let it ride another 12-15 months?
You're the experts - what do you say???
[FYI: I let my '99 4runner (non-interference 5VZ-FE) go 8 years and 158k miles before swapping the timing belt on it. The belt had some initial cracking and aging, and was overdue at that point. However, on a NON-interference engine, it didn't worry me like this one does.]
The TB/WP (90k service) obviously has NOT been done - YET. It's under on mileage, but over on time (over 6 years).
I popped the hood the other day to check the oil and noticed that the serpentine belt has some hairline cracks forming.
I called my local independent shop, and he said I could just have the serpentine changed for now and that he would be comfortable with waiting until 90-100k on the timing belt and the rest of the 90k service.
I've searched, and read on here that even at 90K on some of the older UZJ's, the timing belts still "looked" good.
I'm torn... spend $900+ now to do the service w/ OEM parts, or just replace the serpentine and let it ride another 12-15 months?
You're the experts - what do you say???

[FYI: I let my '99 4runner (non-interference 5VZ-FE) go 8 years and 158k miles before swapping the timing belt on it. The belt had some initial cracking and aging, and was overdue at that point. However, on a NON-interference engine, it didn't worry me like this one does.]