I figured a report might be useful...
Yes, the Tundra steelies are heavier. So too are the 285/70/18 BFG KO2s. But, does it matter? I supposed in a lab setting it might. From my experience so far - 4,000 miles - I can't tell a difference.
I went from OEM 18s with 285/70/18 BFG ATs to 18" Tundra steelies with BFG 285/70/18 BFG KO2s. Off the line and braking - the 100 feels exactly like it did before. I tracked the mileage - on the highway - a few times, and the range of results is the same. This week, with my family of 4, fully loaded for a week at the beach (luggage, chairs, food, typical beach crap, etc.) and NOT caring about mileage, e.g. mostly in the left lane, 70-80 MPH... the trip average was 15.96 MPG. Granted that was 100% highway.
On the highway, the heavy wheels really don't make a difference - rotating mass hurts acceleration and braking. Turning too. The big caveat here is that I haven't (and likely won't) track in-town MPG, where the heavier wheels would (could) make a difference. I mean really, if I was going to sweat a drop from 9.6 to 9.5 MPG... I'm driving the wrong vehicle.
But, as I argued in a thread a while back... if the steel wheels were such a gas hog around town, why don't we see light-weight alloys on UPS and FedEx trucks.
Yes, the Tundra steelies are heavier. So too are the 285/70/18 BFG KO2s. But, does it matter? I supposed in a lab setting it might. From my experience so far - 4,000 miles - I can't tell a difference.
I went from OEM 18s with 285/70/18 BFG ATs to 18" Tundra steelies with BFG 285/70/18 BFG KO2s. Off the line and braking - the 100 feels exactly like it did before. I tracked the mileage - on the highway - a few times, and the range of results is the same. This week, with my family of 4, fully loaded for a week at the beach (luggage, chairs, food, typical beach crap, etc.) and NOT caring about mileage, e.g. mostly in the left lane, 70-80 MPH... the trip average was 15.96 MPG. Granted that was 100% highway.
On the highway, the heavy wheels really don't make a difference - rotating mass hurts acceleration and braking. Turning too. The big caveat here is that I haven't (and likely won't) track in-town MPG, where the heavier wheels would (could) make a difference. I mean really, if I was going to sweat a drop from 9.6 to 9.5 MPG... I'm driving the wrong vehicle.
But, as I argued in a thread a while back... if the steel wheels were such a gas hog around town, why don't we see light-weight alloys on UPS and FedEx trucks.