Today was a big day in future plans for the LC. Been talking with Slee for the last couple of years and decided to take advantage of one of the great strengths of the pre2005 LC100: getting the LRA 40 gallon main tank installed. Appointment is for end of August.
I’m still on the fence about the aux 40 gallon. Slee heavily recommended me to try the main tank first as it is so handy I may not need the aux. So the question is: why on earth would I need or want 80 gallons on tap (twin 40’s)?
In my mind, my logic is backwards of what most people would think. For my big trip days I find 450-600 mile tank range to be plenty for my style and a single 40 gallon accomplishes that.
But for running around town I like to refill at half tank (which is only 8-12 gallons on the OEM) meaning I am refilling about every other day when running around a lot. Complete PITA. With 80 I can have a week pretty easily between refills or really just topping up whenever I want vs planning a stop in my daily plans.
With the single 40 I should be able to handily go 3-5 days in between while still refilling at half tank. More if I let myself go down to 1/4

. Can always add the aux later is the real point and gives me plenty of time to decide on how to carry the spare (my current preference is to remove 3rd row and tie the spare down in the cargo area).
The other thing I’ve decided on: after 315,000 miles I’m pretty sure the rear springs are weak, AND I may have blown compression damping a little in the rear shocks (replaced at 265,000 miles). After talking with Brian @ Slee have decided to finally try OME. Looking for no or minimal lift I am getting the fronts and rears replaced together to have a matching set. Doing everything I can to give the OME’s a quality shot.
I’ll decide more about the rear aux and suspension at next major service (360,000 miles). I like that it would be easy to back to Toyota stuff as the durability of the springs is not in question. Replacing shocks every so often is acceptable.
Any thought on aux tank and way to carry the spare? I’ve read the threads, but people’s opinions are allowed to change with experience. While I obviously value the rear hatch access, I have never lived with a rear bar and might be exaggerating the extra step to access the hatch. Given the choice, I would prefer not to add that much weight if I can help it, but again maybe it is no big deal.
Just to add, 99% of the time I am solo in the LC, and when travelling just one duffel in the back. Having the spare back there will not meaningfully impede my usage.