Is there an advantage to the backbone mounts over the older style?
RLCP02 (old style) advtanges:
- Much easier to access underside of pioneer platform (think of bolting on a rooftop tent)
- Way more aesthetic, less drag/window noise when rack/platform is not installed (the footpacks have inserts to bolt on when a tray or bars aren't attached)
- Modular - allows you to run HD bars OR Pioneer platform
- Potentially easier to install
- Half the price of the backbone
RTLB2 (backbone) advantages:
- Possibly stronger? (Never had an issue with the RLCP02, however. And mine was loaded up to the limit)
- Potentially more aesthetic when pioneer platform is installed (debatable)
I've strongly considered both and I'm currently looking for the RLCP02 to run on my new 100. I don't consider the backbone to bring any tangible advantages. It will be significantly harder to access the underside of the platform and there installing/removing accessories or especially a RTT will be much more difficult.
I also remove my platform when I'm not using it, so the RLCP02 is a significantly better choice - the footprint is miniscule when the platform is removed, whereas the BB looks really out of place:
Base footpack for RLCP02:
Backbone on 100 series with no rack: