How would you compare the build quality of the 200 versus the 100 series? I'm talkin fit and finish and long term durablity as well as low cost of ownership based on reliablity. I know the 200 is larger and has a bigger engine.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
I can speak volumes on this because I own an 80, a 100 and a 200 and the 200 is pure high tech Toyota quality. The 80 is raw Toyota durability except for the interior parts. The 100 is an awsome looking great driving capable truck but the interior parts, the plastic bumpers and the weak front differential bring you down. The 200 is UGLY but well built and has amazing driving capability, still plastic bumpers. I dont think that the interior is particulary good looking but it is much more comfortable and roomy and they have made some of the weak parts of the 100 more durable. The drive hooks you,
Geologic
10LX
07LC
97LX
Ofcourse its not a US Land Cruiser. Its a Middle East LC. Since I'm Arabian, I would know our marketed vehicles since us Arabs prefer cassettes over CDs when going offroad, locking diff and KM/h speedometer.![]()
The 200 is a great all around capable SUV and I think that it's an over performer with decent road manners and off road capability. I use mine like a sports car, a luxury highway hauler, a 4wheeler and a 3/4 ton tower. It's real good at everything but not the best at anything. Interior quality suffers but I use it and don't worry about it. Enjoy!