- Thread starter
- #61
At this point its worth sourcing upgraded front springs...
I would not be chasing preloads for something like this with that much static weight.
Since one, we dont know the spring rates up front i doubt that an LC collar and its tension will be enough.
And two it will be a pain in the ass to trial and error on the rig fiddling with adjustable collars.
Three will it even have the adjustment range if it is dial able?
I think this issue of front springs just needs to be solved, everyone can benefit from it and its the LXs only weakness IMO.
Spacers get a bad rap. In the right application, it's the right solution. There's a whole confluence of factors and it's not necessarily a one solution fits all. It happens all too often that many reach for spring rate when they should be reaching for spacers. Coilover and shocks of many types effectively use "spacers", either with an adjustable threaded perch, or c-clip perch.
That said, the LX works differently. It's combined system spring rate is progressive. Something that's hard for static shocks to tune for which is why most tend to be linear. But since our system is active, it can use it to best effect. Pre-loading to account for additional weight on a progressive system is effectively increasing spring rate to a degree and can be a good solution. Don't want to get too crazy with spring rate, like many LCs do, and suffer the consequence of poor articulation and ride. Many more on that side of the house should be using spacer lifts (unless built heavy).
By shock spacer do you mean the collar spacer/preload collar that goes at the base of the coil?
Meaning the coil spacer is a “top spacer plate” that goes at the top of the coil?
Sorry nomenclatures. By shock spacer, I mean the LC OEM type that fits on the top plate, and pushes the coilover assembly down. Spring spacer, the one that fits within the coilover sandwiched in the spring.