looking for engine and seat recommendations

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Joined
Jul 7, 2007
Threads
6
Messages
8
Location
Middle Tennessee
I want to upgrade my front bench seat. I haven't decided which style I want to go with. Split bench or Bucket. Which either way I go. I want some type of center consol.

I also want to have a more modern enging/transmission. I plan on using this vehicle as my daily driver for many years to come.

Any recommendations or suggestions would be greatly appriciated.

Thanks,
 
seats

I have used the seats from the Mazda MPV. I got both from the yard for about $75. Love them- fully recline, kick foward as well, cushie but not fat, arm rests that go up and down, map pocket on the passenger side, and have a really cool fold up drink holder for the road sodas.

I think my dream would be a 350 with the ranger splitter combined with the landruiser 4 speed. Oh to have the cash for such an endeavor!
 
I'm pretty happy with the 60/40 split bench I scrounged out of an '03 Ford Ranger 2-door extended cab.
(This is in a first-gen 4X4, for the record)
They're a breeze to install because they're built underneath along lines of Toyota's bucket seats of yore, the rails and mounts are all even geometry (some 60/40s will have longer struts on the outside, and shorter ones on the inside) and the front mounts are the same 90* brackets that bolt onto the mounting lip on the floorboards.

The only down sides are their obscurity: Ferd doesn't sell them whole, you have to know what pieces to buy, and acquire them individually, or find good ones from a scrapper; and the height, they stand a good 3" higher than Toyota buckets (pickup or Cruiser, I had a set of each at the time), so if you're tall, you'll bump you head on the roof.

If this is the way that sounds interesting, look for an actual scrapper, the kind that tears the cars down themselves, not Pick-N-Pull, because they don't abuse their stuff as bad as the jokers at a u-pull.
I snagged mine from Cordova Truck Dismantlers in Rancho Cordova, CA. They don't ship seats, but persistence may reveal something useful.

The motor thing is a HUGE can of worms to open. There are as many opinions out there as there are possibilities.
Personally, a built 2F is a fun motor, or a 2H if it can be found. If you're dead-set on a domestic engine, Chevies are common, and cheap, but if I were making the decision, I've gotten a chance to play with Ford's 4.2 Liter Essex V6 (1999+) alot and I'd have to say: that's one of the best V-pattern motors I've ever seen. I'd wager it's power against a 297 Chevy, but it would out torque it in a heartbeat, and still sip less fuel in the process.
The one in my possession has only been down once, and that's because a tech working on it caused some FOD that had to be dealt with.
 
On the topic of engines, Chevy, what's the difference between the Vortec and the Ramjet motors. Also if you convert an older 350 into an injected intake would it be close, as far as preformance, to the newer Vortec engines. Chevy engine with the Toyota H55 5speed, would be a good combo, no
 
On the topic of engines, Chevy, what's the difference between the Vortec and the Ramjet motors. Also if you convert an older 350 into an injected intake would it be close, as far as preformance, to the newer Vortec engines. Chevy engine with the Toyota H55 5speed, would be a good combo, no

Name alone.

Vortec is what Chevy calls a swirl-inducing combustion chamber. It's pretty common-place piece of tech, but, like Mopar and the Hemi, the name belongs to the company that pandered the idea en masse first.

The Ram Jet motor is just an MPFI engine with a ram-style air intake, again, it's a common bit of tech, but its the catchy name that sells.

All small-block V8's are about the same, but I'm not sure Vortec and Bowtie heads are interchangeable. Additionally, the older engines use beefier heavyweight pistons and conrods than what the newer ones have, which means less performance in places, but you avoid GM's "built-in piston slap".
 
Last edited:
Thanks for clearing that up about the engines. I guess if a guy wanted fuel injection, then a multi-port would be better than TBI.
 
Thanks for clearing that up about the engines. I guess if a guy wanted fuel injection, then a multi-port would be better than TBI.

It depends on the application, really.
TBI's advantages are its ease of setup, low cost, and ease of maintenance; on the down side, TBI will restrict high-rev performance (there's only so much two injectors can deliver). This really doesn't matter for us in the offroad community, since what counts is delivery on the lower end of your engine. (Face it, if you think your Cruiser should be roaring down the highway like a Mustang, you may need to rethink things.;))
TrollHole and YotaJosh did some awesome Toyota TBI conversions, Troll's onto a a Big Gay 2F: https://forum.ih8mud.com/sc-upstate-cruisers/167998-big-gay-2f-build.html and Josh's onto a 20R: https://forum.ih8mud.com/79-95-toyo...project-20re-junkyard-fuel-injection-tbi.html.


MP/TPFI on the other hand, is pretty complex to setup, alot more complex to work on, doesn't have the support of TBI or carburetion. Were I to build a multiport setup, I would buy a kit outright from Holley or Edelbrock, or build my own harness from pinout and wiring diagrams before trying to scab two alien harness together. This gets expensive fast, and the benefits are limited for offroad applications. The few users of this system I've talked to definitely enjoyed the extra power, but only needed so much of it, and I'm not sure the ends and the means are within equilibrium.
 
i have scion tc seats in the front very comfortable wouldnt change a think
0215001531.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom