Fellow Land Cruiser lovers, I am on the verge of a 200 series. I travel to Chicago tomorrow to trade my F250 in for either a 2013 black LC w/ 102k on it for 36900, or a 2009 LX570, black, with 74k on it, for 34500. The LX, by the numbers seems to be the better deal not considering the 4 year difference in model year. I found a more extensive service record for the LC than I did for the LX, but the LX was a corporate vehicle for the first owner, and the second owner averaged 4k miles a year per the CARFAX. both are clear titles/no damage or accidents. So my question is this: What is the better deal in your eyes?
Thanks!
CARS.com links to the two are below. The LX pics are on my phone as they just got it in. Not a huge fan of black vehicles but I can't be choosy right now. The chrome 20s on the LX WILL have to go immediately though!
LC: https://www.cars.com/vehicledetail/detail/832490165/overview/
LX: https://www.cars.com/vehicledetail/detail/835114615/overview/ From the pics provided, it's in really great shape as well!
Thanks!
CARS.com links to the two are below. The LX pics are on my phone as they just got it in. Not a huge fan of black vehicles but I can't be choosy right now. The chrome 20s on the LX WILL have to go immediately though!
LC: https://www.cars.com/vehicledetail/detail/832490165/overview/
LX: https://www.cars.com/vehicledetail/detail/835114615/overview/ From the pics provided, it's in really great shape as well!