As Jeremy suggested the option of a top mounted unit I got to thinking about it.
I've never been a fan of them because I have always viewed them as a half hearted solution to mounting an intercooler in an area where you don't have much space.
Am I wrong?
I see the following main issue with it, the heat off the engine rises up and so the intercooler requires much more cooling than the conventional setup of having it up front, unrestricted. Is this a flawed logic?
I just assumed they were made and invented for application where there was not much space and it was better than nothing.
Also, I'ev always found them to be a pain because they are usually over most of the engine and any time you need to do anything, you had to remove them.
What are benefits, and set backs?
I know that there are also ones that have coolant running through them, but once again, how is that a benefit when the coolant is hotter than ambient temp, and usually by a lot. I see that as a benefit is you are trying to heat up the air, not cool it.
I've never been a fan of them because I have always viewed them as a half hearted solution to mounting an intercooler in an area where you don't have much space.
Am I wrong?
I see the following main issue with it, the heat off the engine rises up and so the intercooler requires much more cooling than the conventional setup of having it up front, unrestricted. Is this a flawed logic?
I just assumed they were made and invented for application where there was not much space and it was better than nothing.
Also, I'ev always found them to be a pain because they are usually over most of the engine and any time you need to do anything, you had to remove them.
What are benefits, and set backs?
I know that there are also ones that have coolant running through them, but once again, how is that a benefit when the coolant is hotter than ambient temp, and usually by a lot. I see that as a benefit is you are trying to heat up the air, not cool it.

