Anyone using ethanol free 89 octane fuel exclusively in their cruiser. I noticed at my last fill up that it was 10 cent more than the 87. Curious if there was a significant benefit.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
I will spare everyone my rant on why ethanol make no sense environmentally or economically.
Midwest born and raised but got kicked off the farm for bad attitude...Apparently you aren't a corn farmer or a midwest ag land baron.![]()
Quit teasing us Californians
There's no statewide mandate in Illinois according to that chart but I've not found a gas station within 100 miles of Chicago that has ethanol-free. Even 93 octane has 10% ethanol around here. That could beIf your state gets highway money from the Government your state mandated to use some form of Ethanol … AKA Agricultural Welfare was implemented for gas shortages has turned into as means to pay for political support … It buys votes .
Only Florida and Hawaii have opted out but still see ethanol in Florida , its a cheap way to boost Octane ratings in fuel , flip side less fuel milage and power .
My state of Pa just introduced a bill to repeal ethanol from the whole state , right now if your county does emissions testing you cant have ethanol free gas but if you don’t test for a emissions which is a load of crap , they plug a computer to check your computer that does OBD 2 every time you start your car , no check engine light or codes your good , instead you have to have a test every year .
Can’t wait to retire and move to Floridia full time they have ethanol free at the pumps everywhere … I remember when they 100 octane at the pumps , now its 92 .
Ethanol is crap in my world .View attachment 2837208
Economically the only area it helps is American agriculture. Really helps get rid of low quality surplus grain for a large profit. They have wonderful lobbyists who spin the environmental side. So even better for certain other lobbyists when you have to buy more gas because you get worse mileage per gallon - and it appears "green". I hear your rant.~10% better mpg w/o ethanol. I always fill with no ethanol gas is I can. For me its more about range than cost. That 10% is half a jerry can and 30 miles. I've found that I get the same 10% better mileage with regular none ethanol and not much more if any with premium none ethanol. Most of the time though, around here anyway, only the premium comes in none ethanol.
I will spare everyone my rant on why ethanol make no sense environmentally or economically.
If I am pumping 91 in my bike I assume the guy before me was most likely pumping 87 (or 85) and those hoses must hold a couple of gallons so I am getting lower octane anyway while paying for 91.