It's fun to hear an idealist animal lover giving more credit to a dog than any of us would give to a human of low intelligence. It's an animal, it doesn't think the way we do, we can't understand or predict it.
That's so darling. The vast majority of the time, animal behavior, particularly domesticated animal behavior is fully predictable. Just because you are ignorant of this scientific fact does not make you correct.
Duh.scottm said:And animals are very good at hiding illness and injury, we're likely to miss that a dog is in pain and likely to attack in defense for no apparent reason.
That's "Sealyham terrier", and they're known to be nasty, like Kerry Blues. And they're never "big" seldom exceeding 30 pounds.scottm said:I was attacked repeatedly by a big Selian Terrier at a house I house-sat years ago. :babble babble:
Again, just because you're ignorant, don't assume I am.tofu, i am constantly amazed at your psychoanalytical/deep thinking bull****
i rarely get into these types of discussions. unlike u, i only talk about things i really know about.
Johnnymaz said:while u are correct in stating that through abuse/sickness/poor socialization, a "good breed" like wheatens can produce a biter, and through great care/socialization, a "bad breed" like pits can produce a sweet, cuddly mush, by and large, dogs act like they were BRED to act. they dont know why they do things, they just do them. take the german shorthaired pointer. dog that's never been trained to point will just freeze looking at a pigeon. he cant help it...because it has been genetically programmed by hundreds of years of careful breeding to do just that..find birds, and point. fighting dogs are aggressive....period. even if a pit is a sweet as a teddy bear, there is that little thing in the back of its brain screaming at it to kill..especially if it senses vulnerability. it may not bite, but instinct/genetics are telling it to. if u dont realize that, then ur more of a moron than atticus thinks u are
While your tone sucks, you're correct. But, don't you understand that we actually agree on almost all these points.
Breeds almost always conform to their breed characteristics, no debate on that. All animals can flip like a switch due to injury, disease, etc. However, a HEALTHY dog, bred to fight with other dogs, such as a shar pei, pit bull, or chow is absolutley expected to be a menace towards other dogs. All you can do it train it to resist its impulses and avoid negative stimuli.
Likewise, guard dogs, such as the molossoids (mastiffs), who were trained to attack PEOPLE, should virtually never be fully trusted around people, particularly little kids.
But a dog who is dog-aggressive does not normally become human-aggressive unless it is abused, injured, tormented, or abnormally provoked. It happens, and there are warning signs. They do not just one day decide that Little Timmy is gonna die.
Look, I am not going to go on and on about my background, my experience, my education or my ability to perceive subtle body language in canines, and you'll of course just dismiss anything I have to say on this subject, but I assure you, if you read, you will find that I am correct.
When "good dogs" (towards people) become "bad" (towards people), there is damn near ALWAYS more to the story. It is seldom merely about what breed they are.
Unfortunately, because of their unique toughness, the group of breeds known as "pit bulls" in the States and in Latin America (predominantly) have been especially favored to TRAIN to be human-aggressive by thugs, low-lifes and assorted ass-hats. It is these dogs that comprise the vast majority of the human-bite statistics for that breed (and other, similar ones).
But, again, a chow, pit or any other dog-aggressive breed is not normally aggressive towards humans anymore so than dalmatians, golden retrievers, or poodles, they're just not. The reason why the pit bull appears on so many "most dangerous breeds" lists is because people TRAIN/abuse them to be a menace towards not just the dogs they were bred to be aggressive towards, but people too. Absent this training or abuse, they are jsut typically dog-monsters and that is why there are so many loving, affectionate, completely predictable "pit bulls" and chows as trusted family pets, with zero incidence of human aggression, though one should probably keep other dogs away from them, unless they are very well-socialized and trained.
The Most Aggressive Dog Breeds; Dachshund #1?? « For the Love of the Dog
Last edited: