My brother and I got into a discussion the other day and I said I'd consult with my web gang to settle it. A friend of his (supposedly very smart about autos...) claimed that even a good driver can not get as good gas mileage as the cruise control can.
For example when cruising the highway, you will always get better mileage using the cruise control (assuming the traffic is not too congested). I disagreed. Sometime (mainly in hilly areas) the cruise control will do whatever to keep the speed pegged at the set point. However sometimes like on steep hills I'm ok with it slowing down a bit to climb that super steep hill. Do I really need to floor it and shift down ect.... just to keep it pegged?
I can see that in lots of cases (with lots of different drivers), the cruise control can do better but to make the claim that cruise control will ALWAYS get better mileage then even the best driver is incorrect (in my mind anyway).
What do you guys think, you want to settle this?
Riley
For example when cruising the highway, you will always get better mileage using the cruise control (assuming the traffic is not too congested). I disagreed. Sometime (mainly in hilly areas) the cruise control will do whatever to keep the speed pegged at the set point. However sometimes like on steep hills I'm ok with it slowing down a bit to climb that super steep hill. Do I really need to floor it and shift down ect.... just to keep it pegged?
I can see that in lots of cases (with lots of different drivers), the cruise control can do better but to make the claim that cruise control will ALWAYS get better mileage then even the best driver is incorrect (in my mind anyway).
What do you guys think, you want to settle this?
Riley
Last edited: