Cargo Capacity in LX470/LC100

[Undefined]

I do not (yet... soon) own a 100 series, so I'm just going off of various reviews and specs.

Is this information correct?


Cargo Capacity - all seats in place: 19.1 cu ft.
Cargo Capacity - 2nd row in place, 3rd row folded to side: 39.2 cu ft.
Cargo Capacity - 2nd row in place, 3rd row removed: 55.4 cu ft.
Max Cargo Capacity (2nd row seats down, 3rd row removed): 90.4 cu ft.

 

[coldwiz]

Your numbers are very close

Cargo Capacity - all seats in place: 20.8 cu ft.
Cargo Capacity - 2nd row in place, 3rd row folded to side: 39.2 cu ft.
Cargo Capacity - 2nd row in place, 3rd row removed: 59.7 cu ft.
Max Cargo Capacity (2nd row seats down, 3rd row removed): 90.8 cu ft.

 

[Undefined]

Your numbers are very close

Cargo Capacity - all seats in place: 20.8 cu ft.
Cargo Capacity - 2nd row in place, 3rd row folded to side: 39.2 cu ft.
Cargo Capacity - 2nd row in place, 3rd row removed: 59.7 cu ft.
Max Cargo Capacity (2nd row seats down, 3rd row removed): 90.8 cu ft.

I see. The numbers I posted were for the LX470. I am quite curious as to what is different between the LX and the LC to cause the difference in cargo capacity??

 

[coldwiz]

Maybe it has something to do with the adjustable height suspension in the LX.

 

[Undefined]

Maybe it has something to do with the adjustable height suspension in the LX.

?

What is strange is that with the 3rd row removed and the 2nd row in place there is a 4 cu ft difference between the models, but with the 3rd row removed and the 2nd row folded down there is only a 0.4 cu ft difference.

Perhaps the 2nd row is mounted further back in the LX model to provide more leg room?

 

[Trunk Monkey]

OP's numbers may be from a truck with rear AC, 2nd post from one without.

 

[coldwiz]

I can't answer that but I can tell you that the leg room for all rows is the same in the LX as it is in the LC.

 

[PADDO]

? What is strange is that with the 3rd row removed and the 2nd row in place there is a 4 cu ft difference between the models, but with the 3rd row removed and the 2nd row folded down there is only a 0.4 cu ft difference. Perhaps the 2nd row is mounted further back in the LX model to provide more leg room?

They are the same, nothing to do with AHC, more likely differences in transcribing m3 to ft3, rounding differences or where LxWxD measurements are actually taken.

Sent from my iPhone using IH8MUD

 

[yotasavg]

They are the same, nothing to do with AHC, more likely differences in transcribing m3 to ft3, rounding differences or where LxWxD measurements are actually taken.

Sent from my iPhone using IH8MUD

This is possible, yet I'm going to have to say I'm with Trunk. The most obvious difference in space is that the panel on the right of the cargo area sticks out farther on rear AC models, maybe like 2 inches less space on that corner when you have rear AC?

 

[coldwiz]

All the numbers I posted except the "Cargo Capacity - 2nd row in place, 3rd row removed: 59.7 cu ft" are from a LC with the 3rd row which includes rear AC. The 59.7 is from a truck without the 3rd row and no rear AC so the 4 cu ft difference must be the rear AC like Trunk stated, the 3rd row seat belts, power rear quarter windows, cup holders, assist grips, and whatever else the 3rd row comes with. Comparing mine to Cruzer_89's truck with no 3rd row, the whole right side of my truck with the 3rd row is spaced out 3" or so. There's your 4 cu ft difference.

https://forum.ih8mud.com/100-series-cruisers/794739-got-99-100-no-3rd-row-seats.html