Bridgestone Dueler Revo 2 vs. BFG A/T

[WadeGreenwood]

I've done a good amount of searching and found varying opinions. Not to pile on another tire thread, but I'd be interested to hear from anyone that made the switch from BFG A/Ts to Revo 2's (or vice versa).

I'm currently running 265/75/R16 BFG AT's (less than 1,000 miles on 'em) on 16" steel Tundra rims (backspacing isn't quite right but it works with some 1/4" spacers on the front). I have a chance to purchase some Revo 2's in 285/75/R16. Probably about 5,000 miles on 'em, owner says 14/32s left (16/32s new). They're mounted on some nice steelies with the proper backspacing. The wheels are a definite upgrade.

Since I've got an OME lift I've been thinking of moving up to the 285s to fill up the wheel wells. I've been very happy with BFG's so far (31" and now 265/75), but they're the only brand I've run on my 60. I'm just trying to figure out if the bump up in size and better wheels are worth the switch from BFG to Revo. I'd say my pavement/off-road split is somewhere around 60/40 or 70/30. I do more expedition/camping stuff than hardcore wheeling.

 

[knowaste]

I have run both the BFG's and now several sets of the Revo's. To me the REVO's are a far better tire...much quieter on pavement and certainly no less capable off road. I currently run 31 x 10.5's with an OME med/heavy spring set and they are plenty of tire for the lift (I recall that the 285 x 16's are a near match to the 285 x 16) The REVOs are also great on snow.

 

[mcmain0121]

Not my own experience but; I have a buddy who has used the Dueler's and couple sets of the BFG AT's. Hes got a '00 Silverado with over 200K on it. He also found the Bridgestone's are much quieter, they last longer as well. H has had both offroad and they perform roughly the same. He claims the ride quality is better on the Bridgestones too.