Yes plus the cheaper one looks better proportionately on the LXl my opinion
BFG size recommendation for 08 LX?
- Thread starter Dan Lee
- Start date
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
Yes plus the cheaper one looks better proportionately on the LXl my opinion
Con
Contact patch is literally tenths of an inch difference if you’re concerned with on road handling get a Michelin defender LTX MS if you have extra hundred dollars per tire get the 285 5520 BFG a TKO twos I just don’t have that kind of my extra money
Last edited:
TeCK is correct every decision has a compromise that you need to concern yourself with and then make your decision
I’ve been looking for tires since my hydroplaning accident and I’ve changed the type of tires I want and I changed how I drive in different conditions based on the tires and the conditions and I have looked for the perfect tire For all conditions and it’s not out there! But I have to say that the mud members such as TeCk have been very helpful in my decision-making process
- Thread starter
- #25
Thanks guys. Good info. The current plan is probably keeping this below Jeep rating 4 (basically, avoid situations that will likely damage car and/or high probability of getting stuck).
However, I prefer to over engineer / have headroom when possible. I'm a pessimist. So, while I might plan for 3-4 and try to avoid something more technical, I may end up in a situation where I need the additional capability. For example, I might take a wrong turn somewhere (been known to happen for me
). Or the intended trail is closed for whatever reason and the detour requires the additional capability.
But I don't want to compromise on-road much as I think 80% will be on-road; still, I don't want to get stuck outside the bounds of civilization.
Okay - so functionally mostly indifferent off-pavement. So, stick w/ 285/55 to not compromise on-road. More costly (ie - it could have paid for the spare). But function is king. Buy once, cry once (hopefully).
However, I prefer to over engineer / have headroom when possible. I'm a pessimist. So, while I might plan for 3-4 and try to avoid something more technical, I may end up in a situation where I need the additional capability. For example, I might take a wrong turn somewhere (been known to happen for me
). Or the intended trail is closed for whatever reason and the detour requires the additional capability. But I don't want to compromise on-road much as I think 80% will be on-road; still, I don't want to get stuck outside the bounds of civilization.
Okay - so functionally mostly indifferent off-pavement. So, stick w/ 285/55 to not compromise on-road. More costly (ie - it could have paid for the spare). But function is king. Buy once, cry once (hopefully).
Whether by tenths or inches, wider = more on road cornering and braking traction. That's a measurable fact. Whether you believe there's tangible changes to one as a driver is a personal interpretation.
I know from years of modifying and tracking my cars... Absolutely. I've felt every 10mm increase of width on my 911, from 295, 305, to 315mm. Which is why when I went with AT tires on my LX, I specifically sought even wider tires (305/55/20s), because I value on road handling (more than most I'll acknowledge). If there's value that can be appreciated from everyone, there's safety to be had from better on-road traction. The 200-series is no sports car, so its limits are reachable on the road, whether for sporting needs or emergency maneuvers.
That said, I'll offer another great tire out there - https://www.walmart.com/ip/Falken-W...35517&wl11=online&wl12=54383723&wl13=&veh=sem
Great rain and snow performance with its deepest in category treads.
I know from years of modifying and tracking my cars... Absolutely. I've felt every 10mm increase of width on my 911, from 295, 305, to 315mm. Which is why when I went with AT tires on my LX, I specifically sought even wider tires (305/55/20s), because I value on road handling (more than most I'll acknowledge). If there's value that can be appreciated from everyone, there's safety to be had from better on-road traction. The 200-series is no sports car, so its limits are reachable on the road, whether for sporting needs or emergency maneuvers.
That said, I'll offer another great tire out there - https://www.walmart.com/ip/Falken-W...35517&wl11=online&wl12=54383723&wl13=&veh=sem
Great rain and snow performance with its deepest in category treads.
Will it fit in the spare tire location and will it fit without any mods to my wheel liners
- Thread starter
- #28
Agree - safety is key. I know somewhat how to chase on-road safety. I know absolutely nothing about what it takes for off-pavement safety. So lots of YT watching (both success and fail) and the great info you guys share here will be the basis of my decision on how to balance the two.
Thanks for the alternative recommendation. Will look closely at that. Tread looks similar to the K02 as well.
Thanks for the alternative recommendation. Will look closely at that. Tread looks similar to the K02 as well.
- Thread starter
- #30
Keep the suggestions coming -- I'd consider all recommendations from those more experienced. I have no interest in re-inventing the wheel.
I had a chance to really go off pavement today. First time ever. It's probably nothing to you guys but it had me wondering if I could make it or not:
1) lots of rocks of all shapes and sizes. I was worried about tire puncture or the bead separating; I don't know what it takes but I saw YT videos of it happening and it doesn't look like it takes much to do it. Although they were probably aired down and I was still at 38psi.
2) pretty deep ruts (in my mind); I'd guess a good foot deep. I was really concerned I'd get stuck in one of them. I tried to straddle them or drive to the side of them. Worried that if a tire fell in, if I'd tip over and/or get stuck - don't know the technique to get out. I'm sure the wheels was right on the edge. I have some very nice pinstripes (my first) down one side of the car. Not sure if I can buff them out or if they will be permanent now (woody bushes, low tree branches). A little unhappy about that but the first time is the worst. I would have probably turned around if I could. But perhaps it's good that I couldn't -- I think the experience of walking a line, visualizing the path the car would take and then actually doing it was good experience and somewhat confidence building. Still, pinstripes. Ugh.
In any case, since I was all alone, if the K02 or the WP are hardier and more resistant to punctures and bead separation, I'd be more comfortable with them on. Lots of favorable reviews for both. It's hard to find any comments, good or bad, on my HT Plus.
I had a chance to really go off pavement today. First time ever. It's probably nothing to you guys but it had me wondering if I could make it or not:
1) lots of rocks of all shapes and sizes. I was worried about tire puncture or the bead separating; I don't know what it takes but I saw YT videos of it happening and it doesn't look like it takes much to do it. Although they were probably aired down and I was still at 38psi.
2) pretty deep ruts (in my mind); I'd guess a good foot deep. I was really concerned I'd get stuck in one of them. I tried to straddle them or drive to the side of them. Worried that if a tire fell in, if I'd tip over and/or get stuck - don't know the technique to get out. I'm sure the wheels was right on the edge. I have some very nice pinstripes (my first) down one side of the car. Not sure if I can buff them out or if they will be permanent now (woody bushes, low tree branches). A little unhappy about that but the first time is the worst. I would have probably turned around if I could. But perhaps it's good that I couldn't -- I think the experience of walking a line, visualizing the path the car would take and then actually doing it was good experience and somewhat confidence building. Still, pinstripes. Ugh.
In any case, since I was all alone, if the K02 or the WP are hardier and more resistant to punctures and bead separation, I'd be more comfortable with them on. Lots of favorable reviews for both. It's hard to find any comments, good or bad, on my HT Plus.
Sounds like you need the “D” rated 275/60/20 or 285/55/20 BFG AT/KO2’s or you could go with the “E” rated 285/55/20 Wild
^ Now that is my kind of spreadsheet! Nice! Too bad you only reviewed every single 20" and excluded 18's! How about a second tab???
heh, I just picked up a set of Tundra 18's, so stay tuned
OK based on safety I’m going to 285 5520 BFG a TKO‘s but I’m running my OEM spare to save cash
- Thread starter
- #38
Cool. I'm leaning toward 285/55/20 as well but still trying to decide between K02 and WP AT3w. Probably K02 as the WP aren't carried by my usual shops; I'm going to check if they will purchase and install even though it's something they typically don't carry. If not, then K02 it is.
KO2’s are better looking and “D” rated. They weigh like 58 lbs where the
“E” rated WP’s are even heavier like ??
- Thread starter
- #40
58 lbs per Falken's website....
If we go w/ Falken, assuming just as safe and capable as K02, we could buy the spare for less than the cost of 4 K02s.....
WILDPEAK A/T3W TIRE
If we go w/ Falken, assuming just as safe and capable as K02, we could buy the spare for less than the cost of 4 K02s.....
WILDPEAK A/T3W TIRE
