I'm not a fan of the idea that people with more seniority or who have been on more maintenance runs should get to run roughshod over whatever rules of decency this forum is supposed to have. Everyone should be equal in that regard, including oft-absentee members like me and the many non-members who frequent the club section.
When people converse casually in text there are often multiple meanings that can be interpreted by the reader. It'd be smart for us to at least proof-read what we've written and imagine it being read by someone out of context.
Posts with some meaningful content and a little jab at the end for fun are one thing. Vitriolic posts dedicated entirely to belittling one person or group are of no benefit and should be actively discouraged.
I've been on this forum for 2.5 years and I've never seen anything as out of line as post #33 and I've always known Mat and Glenn to be decent people, both on the forum and in person. Though some may not agree with their end-goal, their having simply raised the issue is of benefit to everyone.
When people converse casually in text there are often multiple meanings that can be interpreted by the reader. It'd be smart for us to at least proof-read what we've written and imagine it being read by someone out of context.
Posts with some meaningful content and a little jab at the end for fun are one thing. Vitriolic posts dedicated entirely to belittling one person or group are of no benefit and should be actively discouraged.
I've been on this forum for 2.5 years and I've never seen anything as out of line as post #33 and I've always known Mat and Glenn to be decent people, both on the forum and in person. Though some may not agree with their end-goal, their having simply raised the issue is of benefit to everyone.