Attention '04 owners...

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Joined
May 4, 2004
Threads
10
Messages
133
I occasionally noticed that when using Bluetooth on my Land Cruiser, the audio would stay muted after I ended the call. The only way to get it working again is to turn the vehicle off. Kinda inconvenient when travelling down the highway. Well I found out today that there is a TSB out for that problem. The TSB states that the headunit needs to be replaced!

I've now had the mult-function (Nav) display go out and now this. Fortunately both have been and will be covered under extended warranty. The display was a $5000 part and I gotta imagine the head unit isn't cheap either.

This is my second Land Cruiser, and I've always been a big advocate of Toyota quality, but I'm getting a little concerned here. We're talking in excess of $5000 in repairs for a vehicle that's just over two years old.

I'm wondering if '04 was just a bad year. I just thought I'd let you guys know in case you're experiencing the same.
 
Toyota quality never refered to the the electronic gizmos. It looks like 90% of the newer owners complaints are DVD/NAV/Bluetooth related.
 
NMuzj100 said:
Toyota quality never refered to the the electronic gizmos. It looks like 90% of the newer owners complaints are DVD/NAV/Bluetooth related.

????

What do you meant that Toyota quality never referred to electronic gizmos? They're part of the car right? These vehicles aren't cheap andwhile I understand mechanically they are over engineered, I think it's inexcusable that you could end up having to spend thousands of $$$ on a two year old vehicle.

I've since run across this article


from nytimes

August 5, 2006
Repairing Some Dents in an Image
By MICHELINE MAYNARD and MARTIN FACKLER
The news is something no car owner wants to hear. Power steering on their hard-to-get hybrid could fail. Tires on their small pickups could bulge and possibly burst. Air bags may not inflate during a crash.

These recalls are the type that have long bedeviled American carmakers, but this time it was Toyota of Japan, long known as the crème de la crème in quality.

Just as Toyota appears poised to pass General Motors to become the world’s largest automaker, it has a growing problem with recalls that is sullying its carefully honed image.

In the United States, Toyota’s largest market, the number of vehicles recalled soared to 2.2 million last year. That was double the number of vehicles recalled in 2004, and more than 10 times the 200,000 cars it recalled in 2003, according to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

In Japan, the number of recalled vehicles has jumped 41-fold since 2001, to 1.9 million last year. And because many of the recalls are for vehicles that are more than 10 years old, analysts fear that another wave of bad quality news may be in store.

The situation has alarmed Toyota’s top executives and angered the Japanese government. It ordered Toyota to explain itself, which the company did in a report delivered Thursday, accompanied by the latest in a series of apologies. In it, the company promised to create a new computer database to obtain information more quickly from dealers on repairs and complaints. The police in Japan said three Toyota officials were under criminal investigation on suspicion that they concealed vehicle defects over eight years.

Inside Toyota, the spate of recalls and the criminal investigation has caused a flurry of high-level efforts to diagnose and fix the problems, which have affected its Prius hybrid, the gold standard among fuel-efficient vehicles; the Tacoma pickup; and cars in its Lexus luxury lineup.

Quality problems can befall any company, whether based in Detroit, Europe or elsewhere. This week, in fact, Ford expanded a recall of its vans, sport utility vehicles and pickup trucks because of problems with cruise control systems that were prone to catching fire.

For now, Toyota’s quality issues do not seem to be damping its operations either in Japan, where it is the biggest automaker, or the United States, where Toyota passed Ford in July to rank as the No. 2 company in terms of auto sales. Nor is it affecting Toyota’s net income, which climbed 39.2 percent during the second-quarter, to $3.2 billion, the company said yesterday. [Page C4.]

But executives know they cannot let the situation fester, because it ultimately threatens Toyota’s ability to grow. If they fail to get their arms around the problem, they will have to pull back on the company’s expansion plans, which are set to include more assembly and engine plants for the United States, as well as factories elsewhere.

At Toyota’s annual executive meeting in June, its departing chairman, Hiroshi Okuda; the new chairman, Fujio Cho; and its chief executive, Katsuaki Watanabe, all vowed to managers that the quality issue would be addressed, according to a senior Toyota executive who attended the meeting.

“The quality issue is a big concern. They’re embarrassed about it,” said the executive, who insisted on anonymity because the meeting was private.

“You think about Toyota, and quality is in our DNA,” he continued. “We are concerned about looking like the rest of the pack. The market is forgiving because of our long reputation, but how long will they be forgiving?”

Interviews with car owners and dealers show they have some latitude.

Bruce Wachtell, 71, bought a 2006 Prius in March after years of driving a Toyota Tacoma pickup without any problems.

“It’s never seen a dealer,” he said of the truck.

Mr. Wachtell, a retired ship’s radio officer living in Stinson Beach, Calif., began buying foreign cars after growing frustrated with the quality of American-made vehicles. That sentiment is confirmed, he said, whenever he peruses repair records for various brands in Consumer Reports, and he has not lost any confidence in Toyota because of the recent recalls.

“I think recalls are just simply a function of the fact that no design is perfect,” he said.

Mr. Wachtell called his dealership after discovering recall notices that included the 2006 Prius on the Internet, but he was told his vehicle was not among those affected. Both the Tacoma and the Prius, however, are among the vehicles in Toyota’s recent recalls.

At Bredemann Toyota in Park Ridge, Ill., Don Ziemke, the general sales manager, said only a few shoppers had asked about the implications of the recalls. Other dealers said they had prepared their employees to answer such questions, but that no one had even brought up the topic.

“Toyota’s longevity and reliability has always been a strong suit,” Mr. Ziemke said. “That kind of takes a hit when there are recalls out there.”

Still, he said, “It’s against the grain as far as what Toyota has provided its dealer body and customers in the past.”

The primary reason for the recalls is Toyota’s overloaded engineering staff, say company executives and industry analysts.

Despite its global expansion during the 1990’s, it failed to hire enough engineers to keep up with production increases.

And it kept most of its development in Japan, even though it built research and development centers in places like Ann Arbor, Mich., and Brussels. At the same time, a new Japanese law required companies to pay for overtime for white-collar workers, raising the costs incurred by engineers, whose long hours on the job were the stuff of industry legend.

Analysts say that all this may have contributed to a number of errors introduced during vehicle development. There have been fewer problems on the assembly line, however, which has been a more common cause of recent recalls at other carmakers like Nissan.

Another issue is that Toyota, like other global auto companies, has farmed out the development of key components to its suppliers, both companies with which it has been doing business for years, like Denso of Japan, and newer ones, like the Delphi Corporation, the biggest American parts maker.

The damage has been slow to emerge — indeed, most recent recalls involve cars produced in the 1990’s. But that means potential problems from hectic growth years in the early 2000’s have yet to appear, and analysts warn that Toyota’s quality woes may only become worse before they get better.

“I’m more concerned about the future,” said Kunihiko Shiohara, an auto analyst for Goldman Sachs in Tokyo. “A fundamental turnaround in quality levels will take at least four years.”

It also does not help that some rivals appear to be gaining quality ground on Toyota, whose Toyota-brand cars and Lexus line of luxury cars had long topped quality rankings. It still dominated the recommended list from Consumer Reports this year. But in June, a survey of new-vehicle quality by J. D. Power & Associates, a marketing research company, ranked the German luxury carmaker Porsche in the top spot, and with Hyundai of South Korea in second place, ahead of Toyota at No. 3.

To be sure, rising recall numbers are not limited to Toyota. A reason that recalls have gone up is that automakers are using an increasing number of common parts across a number of car models, which saves money, but also means that flaws affect larger numbers of vehicles.

Another is the increasing complexity of vehicles, as companies rely more heavily on electronics and computerized features that used to be mechanical. “It’s not fair to single out Toyota for many problems,” said Takaki Nakanishi, an auto industry analyst with J. P. Morgan in Tokyo.

Still, the rapid rise in recalls at Toyota stands out in comparison with other carmakers. In Japan, where Toyota is the largest auto company, with about 39 percent of the market, its recalls quadrupled over the last four years, to 1.9 million in 2005. That compares with 199,000 at No. 2 Nissan and 205,000 at Honda in 2005, according to the transportation ministry.

In Toyota’s case, 68 percent of its recent recalls can be blamed on design flaws, according to Goldman Sachs. They include rubber parts not made thick enough to withstand engine heat and joints too weak to hold together. Of Toyota’s recalls in 2004, 68 percent were because of design problems, Goldman Sachs said.

Analysts say Toyota’s problems stem from the mid-1990’s, when Mr. Okuda, who was president, began expanding its global production. Toyota did not hire enough engineers to keep up with production increases because it was trying to meet tough self-imposed cost-cutting targets, analysts said.

Understaffed design centers have also forced Toyota to rely on large parts makers to help design major components “Toyota’s resources have been stretched quite a bit by the big increases in volume,” said Andrew Phillips, an analyst at Nikko Citigroup in Tokyo. “What’s remarkable is that most the recalls now predate the really big ramp-up.”

That came after 2000, when Toyota’s annual vehicle sales rose to the almost 8.85 million expected this year, from about 6 million.

But Toyota has increased the hiring of new engineers, bringing on 979 last year, compared with 310 in 2001. A company spokesman, Paul Nolasco, said Toyota planned to hire at least another 850 this year.

In a departure from corporate tradition that stressed spending a career at a single company, Toyota wants 200 of its new hires to be experienced engineers hired in midcareer from elsewhere.

In June, Toyota assigned a second executive vice president to its quality control division and created a new senior managing director spot dedicated to improving quality.

“Everyone is taking this very seriously,” said a top-ranking executive in Toyota’s North American operations who spoke only on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the situation. The stakes are high, he added: “If we can’t lick it, we will have to slow down” — a decision Toyota hopes it does not have to make.

Nick Bunkley contributed reporting for this article.
 
Not good, I can see this problem with our starter failures and exhaust manifold cracking. Both of these are design related. Since the 100 series was designed in the early 90's, I'm sure they had enough engineers working on it. But it sounds like the Nav problems come from the early 2000's.
 
:( Bummer. I am sure now that I have read about it I will have the problem.
 
SWUtah said:
Not good, I can see this problem with our starter failures and exhaust manifold cracking. Both of these are design related. Since the 100 series was designed in the early 90's, I'm sure they had enough engineers working on it. But it sounds like the Nav problems come from the early 2000's.

I'm sure even the navs are planned a few years in advance. The 2004's have the gen-4 nav while the '00?-03 have the older gen-3 nav. Toyota still apparently doesn't have a fix for problems w/ the '03+ V8 4runner...stuff like driver's seat has movement/play in it, harmonic vibration in the steering at certain engine rpm's, problems w/ moonroof noises, etc. That was one major factor for buying a used 100. Except for the nav on the 04 and exhaust manifolds and starter contacts on all of them (and driver's side window guide), there's not much else that's gone wrong.
 
Jim_Chow said:
I'm sure even the navs are planned a few years in advance. The 2004's have the gen-4 nav while the '00?-03 have the older gen-3 nav. Toyota still apparently doesn't have a fix for problems w/ the '03+ V8 4runner...stuff like driver's seat has movement/play in it, harmonic vibration in the steering at certain engine rpm's, problems w/ moonroof noises, etc. That was one major factor for buying a used 100. Except for the nav on the 04 and exhaust manifolds and starter contacts on all of them (and driver's side window guide), there's not much else that's gone wrong.

Jim, I agree the 100 series is the pick of the litter :-) when someone is looking at solid dependable vehicle. I just hate the idea of a $5000.00 Nav going bad after the warranty is up. Plus the Nav runs the air/heat so you can't just say oh well and let it go.
 
SWUtah said:
Jim, I agree the 100 series is the pick of the litter :-) when someone is looking at solid dependable vehicle. I just hate the idea of a $5000.00 Nav going bad after the warranty is up. Plus the Nav runs the air/heat so you can't just say oh well and let it go.

Just thought I'd mention that the electrical FSM for the LX has schematics for versions with and w/o nav. So in theory, provided one could source the parts, the climate control could be eliminated from the nav.
 
Yup, here is one...

int3.JPG
 
where is that pic of the interior from? which model?
 
2005 Toyota Cygnus VX (basically Land Cruiser with Lexus front fascia)
 
i really like the seperate hvac controls. having it intergrated into my nav system is my least favorite part of my lc
 
Gohawks63 said:
????
What do you meant that Toyota quality never referred to electronic gizmos? They're part of the car right? These vehicles aren't cheap andwhile I understand mechanically they are over engineered, I think it's inexcusable that you could end up having to spend thousands of $$$ on a two year old vehicle.

I didn't mean It's acceptable but just pointing out that Toyota's quality reputation was acheived primarily with platforms with a lot lower electronic content. Electronics are not a Toyota core competency and are subbed out with a loss of QC.

One of my main worries about buying a vehicle with tons of advanced electronic components is that even if they last. In ten years they will be hopelessly dated when the mechanicals of the vehicle are still running strong.

Interesting article. Could indicate why Toyota is in no rush to redesign the 100.
 
Last edited:
NMuzj100 said:
[snip]Interesting article. Could indicate my Toyota is in no rush to redesign the 100.

Yep, too few dollars and too little market share to chase after for the effort. Also, not much competition in the global LC market, at least not as much as the mid/full-sized truck/SUV market here. Besides, people overseas don't buy new cars every 5 yrs like here (so again, fewer dollars to chase).
 
I've got an '04 that was built by ARCO and I've had zero problems with my 2004 over 30k miles. No worries. I'm keeping it for many years to come.

I live with the bluetooth glitch. I've found that if you end the call w/ the phone, you are more likely to have the problem. If you end the call w/ the steering wheel or Nav screen, the problem seems to occur less. I'd rather not have the dealer rip the dash apart for this minor hiccup.

Just stick w/ the headset for your phone. I hope you didn't buy the Land Cruiser for it's calling capabilities.
 
Glockenspiel said:
I've got an '04 that was built by ARCO and I've had zero problems with my 2004 over 30k miles. No worries. I'm keeping it for many years to come.

I live with the bluetooth glitch. I've found that if you end the call w/ the phone, you are more likely to have the problem. If you end the call w/ the steering wheel or Nav screen, the problem seems to occur less. I'd rather not have the dealer rip the dash apart for this minor hiccup.

Just stick w/ the headset for your phone. I hope you didn't buy the Land Cruiser for it's calling capabilities.

No I didn't buy it for it's calling abilities, but I also expect it to work.

They already ripped apart the dash to replace the Nav screen, and after spending $56k for a vehicle and $1,400 for an extended warranty, I'm not "living" with anything. It's actually not a big deal to remove the headunit.
 
Gohawks63 said:
No I didn't buy it for it's calling abilities, but I also expect it to work.

They already ripped apart the dash to replace the Nav screen, and after spending $56k for a vehicle and $1,400 for an extended warranty, I'm not "living" with anything. It's actually not a big deal to remove the headunit.

Sounds like I wouldn't be gaining much if I traded my 99 with 67K miles that's paid off for a 2005 with 30K miles?
 
SWUtah said:
Sounds like I wouldn't be gaining much if I traded my 99 with 67K miles that's paid off for a 2005 with 30K miles?

1. Get the 99 detailed at a good place ($100)
2. Buy a New top of the line Magellan Wiz-bang GPS Unit ($600 ?)
2. Visit Verizon and Buy a new cell phone w/Bluetooth ability ($300)
3. Get a new-car smell Pine tree and slide it under your seat ($2)

95% of what you'd have in a 2006 for 1/50th the price and if any of the new gadgets goes down you can mail it to the manufacturer instead of leaving your commuting car with a dealer.

If you really need the new car feel just replace the windshield. ;)
 
NMuzj100 said:
1. Get the 99 detailed at a good place ($100)
2. Buy a New top of the line Magellan Wiz-bang GPS Unit ($600 ?)
2. Visit Verizon and Buy a new cell phone w/Bluetooth ability ($300)
3. Get a new-car smell Pine tree and slide it under your seat ($2)

95% of what you'd have in a 2006 for 1/50th the price and if any of the new gadgets goes down you can mail it to the manufacturer instead of leaving your commuting car with a dealer.

If you really need the new car feel just replace the windshield. ;)


I don't know if the VVTI engine and AHC suspension qualify as only 5%... :flipoff2:
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom