- Joined
- Sep 4, 2020
- Threads
- 121
- Messages
- 1,597
- Location
- Brunei Darussalam
- Website
- eurasiaoverland.com
'Just get rid of the ACSD'. A common reply on the forum - if this is your firmly held opinion, you may not wish to read any further.
I'm not trying to persuade anyone to do one thing or another, just interested to discuss/learn about the failures. By failure I mean the shaft disintegrating. I'm not interested in leaks or the thermowax losing its properties.
I'm interested in these ACSD failures for a few reasons:
-I like the function and wish to retain it my engine, while understanding the risks of the shaft failing. There could also be arguments based on individual cirumstances for keeping it such as legal emissions control requirements, or just for originality's sake.
-I only heard about ACSD failure once I joined this forum. In terms of documented examples, I have only seen shaft failure in the 1HD-T. Understand that in Europe, where Toyota diesels are very common, these things were fitted to a whole generation of Toyota diesel engines (the vast majority of which would have been four cylinder engines), and I have never heard of them failing on UK based Hilux owners groups/forums, or in any reading about maintaining or overhauling Toyota injection pumps.
Now, I have two dismantled ACSDs here with which to make an observation. These are not from 1HD-Ts, but I believe the shafts are basically the same.
In the following picture are two ACSD shafts:
Left: a 14B ACSD (which went into production in 1988) from my 1994 15B-T engine.
Right: courtesy of @frankenyota, a 15B-F ACSD (which went into production in 1995).
Notice how the 1988 ACSD has a two piece shaft where the cam appears to be pressed/stamped onto the shaft. From what I have seen, it is this part that always disintegrates when the shaft fails. On the 1995 ACSD, the shaft appears to be turned from a single piece. A 'billet ACSD'! It also has a much larger cam, and a much larger washer. I would suggest that this has been done to prevent shaft failure, and that these design of shafts will not fail in the same manner.
Now, let's look at 1HD ACSDs (both photos taken from Partsouq website).
Firstly, the 1HD-T ACSD, 22790-17141, launched in 1990:
And the 1HD-FT ACSD, 22790-17840, launched in 1995:
So, the same design change that I documented in the 14B vs 15B-F ACSDs.
My question - has anyone got a documented case of ACSD failure on a 1HD-FT?
EO
I'm not trying to persuade anyone to do one thing or another, just interested to discuss/learn about the failures. By failure I mean the shaft disintegrating. I'm not interested in leaks or the thermowax losing its properties.
I'm interested in these ACSD failures for a few reasons:
-I like the function and wish to retain it my engine, while understanding the risks of the shaft failing. There could also be arguments based on individual cirumstances for keeping it such as legal emissions control requirements, or just for originality's sake.
-I only heard about ACSD failure once I joined this forum. In terms of documented examples, I have only seen shaft failure in the 1HD-T. Understand that in Europe, where Toyota diesels are very common, these things were fitted to a whole generation of Toyota diesel engines (the vast majority of which would have been four cylinder engines), and I have never heard of them failing on UK based Hilux owners groups/forums, or in any reading about maintaining or overhauling Toyota injection pumps.
Now, I have two dismantled ACSDs here with which to make an observation. These are not from 1HD-Ts, but I believe the shafts are basically the same.
In the following picture are two ACSD shafts:
Left: a 14B ACSD (which went into production in 1988) from my 1994 15B-T engine.
Right: courtesy of @frankenyota, a 15B-F ACSD (which went into production in 1995).
Notice how the 1988 ACSD has a two piece shaft where the cam appears to be pressed/stamped onto the shaft. From what I have seen, it is this part that always disintegrates when the shaft fails. On the 1995 ACSD, the shaft appears to be turned from a single piece. A 'billet ACSD'! It also has a much larger cam, and a much larger washer. I would suggest that this has been done to prevent shaft failure, and that these design of shafts will not fail in the same manner.
Now, let's look at 1HD ACSDs (both photos taken from Partsouq website).
Firstly, the 1HD-T ACSD, 22790-17141, launched in 1990:
And the 1HD-FT ACSD, 22790-17840, launched in 1995:
So, the same design change that I documented in the 14B vs 15B-F ACSDs.
My question - has anyone got a documented case of ACSD failure on a 1HD-FT?
EO
Last edited: