To fuel the eternal 35" 315/75r16 debate I was playing around in Excel to validate my personal thought that the extra size of the 315/75 vs the 295/75 can't be that impactful. Not from an offroad capability standpoint and not from an size advantage standpoint.
Although mentally the 35" club is where many of us strive to be. 15mm is the total radius difference. That is about the width of my thumbnail. My thumbnail!
What is crazy to me is that 295/75 is the recommended MAXIMUM tire size you can run on a stock rig without rubbing.
This is a mathematical calculation of the tire, of course there will be variations mounted on an 8" rim or an 8.5" rim, etc and you may have 1-2.5mm variation in radius once mounted.
I thought this was interesting. I'm not trying to point anything out, this is coming from a place of ignorance - I do not have 35s or 315s on my truck, nor do I have 295s. I am stock height with torsion bar crank at ~21.25" hub to fender in the front, no idea about the back but I still have some visible rake.
I've been tossing the idea about of purchasing some OME 2860 coils for the rear, installing my diff drop, and the real problem: decide to re-gear when Yotamasters installs my front ARB or not.
If I regear I'll most likely try to get a set of 315s for those times when we go on a trail run or a weekend expo.
A little pinch weld hammering, some fender rolling, and if I had my way I would really like to do some sheet metal modification in the wheel wells all around to make this an easy do. I just wish I had some sheet metal skills.
Food for thought for all of you anyway.
I'm not going anywhere with my 100 this weekend, so hopefully some of you will do some bench wheeling with me.
Brett