BLUF/TLDR - It helps me establish rationale for my continuing on the 10k OCI.
For me, it's to see whether or not the oil I have in it (Amsoil SS) is still protecting my engine after leaving it in there for 10k miles. Having the TBN value lets me know it's still got some left in the tank despite my changing it. I know people consistently poopoo on leaving oil for more than 5k miles, but that is old school thinking IMO given how far we've come compared to the 3-5k OCI's. I also like to see the insoluble levels, etc to see how the filter and engine are fairing given the miles/hrs on the engine and oil/filter combo. As others have experienced, my copper was also high. Lots of reasons given by Blackstone for this value being elevated, but no consensus yet on why it's high on so many late model 200s. Good to have more data so we can figure out what (if anything) needs to be addressed given this elevated value beyond what's considered a normal value (bushings, bearings, etc). Hopefully yet another thing I have spent money on for no other reason than it makes me feel educated on why I do what I do.
Counterpoint. Would have likely spent less and maintained an overall healthier engine by just using normal oils and OEM filters with the factory recommended OCI. Analysis like these are trying to re-engineer best practice via limited data. I say limited because the factory isn't just considering TBNs.
I loved every part of it, especially tuning the key after all that work and it ran great.
I'm a bit of a data geek. I baby/spoil my vehicles. I routinely get just over 21mpg hwy, so I know it's running fine - I guess I now have a baseline and won't do another analysis for a long, long time. I have a '13 Taco with ~95k miles and I'll do it's first analysis for that pretty soon, as a baseline.

