Nope, not a vendor, agent, relative or anyone who makes a profit from this stuff. I researched this considerably before getting one. Popular ones in Au are Dtronic, unichip, DP chip, Steinbauher ( or something). I have experienced about 15% extra power and ever so slight decrease in fuel consumption. Go to Australian 4WD Monthly Online Forums - Search Results which is the 4wd monthly forum search on th subject.
You will see hunderds of user opinions for yourself.
Not sure what BSFC is but here is the dyno results from one vendor.
Dyno Graphs - Results of Power and Torque Increases with the DPChip fitted to various vehicles
"The 2.2L diesel in the Avensis puts out 400Nm, since the V8 is similar to two of these combined the potential output could be 800Nm. Toyota will have very good reasons for detuning this engine, uprating it without understanding why could prove to be very expensive"
Maybe but if it really is 2 of these put together isn't 800nm which is more than enough?
It also isnt a simple matter of more fuel = more power, 3rd generation CRD's less LESS fuel to develop MORE HP by injecting several smaller amounts of fuel as it burns.
In the UK the 2.2l diesel in the Avensis is available as a 140hp (310nm) or 177hp version (400nm) with almost exactly the same economy. The only main difernece is that the 140hp version is marlketed as low emission( and therefore gets tax breaks). How does your explaination work there? I think this exactly proves the point.
BSFC = Brake Specific Fuel Consumption. It's a measure of how many grams of fuel are required to produce each kilowatt of crank power. Lower numbers mean higher efficiency, i.e. less fuel for the same power.
You may not be aware, but modern common rail engines do not have significantly higher peak efficiency than many of the old mechanical injected diesels. My 1985 turbo diesel has a best BSFC of 209 g/kwh. BMW's 535D engine only makes 205 g/kwh.
The only way a chip could provide better fuel economy is if it improves BSFC or via the well known placebo effect.
I'm not going to believe that an aftermarket tuner can get better efficiency from an engine than toyota can, so that just leaves the well established placebo effect.
Power and torque increases are granted, I've seen many such dyno plots and don't have a problem with them.
The pre, main and post injection events of commonrail engines were developed by the engine manufacturers, not aftermarket tuners. The primary goals of that are noise and emission reduction. Again this is not something that any aftermarket tuners have improved upon.
Toyota UK do show a MPG and hence CO2 emission difference between the 177hp and 140hp 2.2L avensis engines. The higher rated engine uses more fuel on the same test standard.
Welcome to Toyota GB
