Why are land cruisers better then jeeps and blazers

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

"Your post in retort bascially said everything any of us needed to know. You dont work on your own truck and you took it to the dealer to get it fixed.
Maybe, just maybe, had you taken it to a cruiser shop to have it worked on you would have been in better shape."

So taking it to a dealership is a bad idea? I wonder what CruiserDan and CruiserDrew would have to say about this. Is the quality of workmanship so bad that you should void your factory warranty by taking your rig to Urban LandCruisers because they hold the sacred keys of Cruiser knowledge that the factory techs lack? Especially when those techs have owned more cruisers over the years than Landpimp? You make a statement that is partially accurate due to the fact that most dealerships are not well versed in Cruiser technology. You probably are better off taking the truck into Urban LC. On the other hand, the guys I have used often have more years of Cruiser experience than most guys on the board have been alive. I can appreciate your statement but have difficulties believing that a basic belt install is beyond the abilities of most dealerships. Yes, you have probably done more LC belt installs in a year than most dealerships will see in a lifetime, but it does not involve rocket science to do the job right. If I lived around Atlanta, I'm sure that I might be one of your most frequent customers. As I do not live around Atlanta, I have to resort to the next best thing, a noncruiserspecialty shop, A.K.A., the Toyota dealership. The OEM belt failure was the root of the problem. The engine has always been maintained by myself and the dealership to run efficiently. Yes, I have had the dealership do work for me. That doesn't mean that I don't do much of the work myself. My day job does not involve working on LandCruisers. That is your job. A belt change is a simple affair. Yes I can do the job easily, but the rear transfercase output seal was being replaced at the same time so I had the new belts thrown on because it was in the shop anyway. Can I rebuild a t-case. Yes, I can. I can also rebuild engines and manual transmissions. I stop short of getting involved with automatics. Does this mean that I want to wrench? No. I have other interests and responsibilites. Pay the techs. They like the work and have mouths to feed. Just because a truck goes into a shop doesn't mean that the owner is unable to do the work himself. It's cheaper for me to pay someone than to take the time to do it myself. I'm sure that you have customers like this. I own a mig welder, tubing bender, oxy/acetylene setup, etc. etc. and have a fully equipped shop. I've taught welding at the university level. I also taught engine building and heavy equipment maintenance and operation. Maybe if I knew how to do a basic tuneup, the fan belt wouldn't have failed, leading to a cracked head, right? As for the mileage, show me a 92 with a Kaymar roofrack, ARB & winch, OME lift, and 33's on stock gears that gets better than 10-11 mpg. Thus the mileage issue. I am happy that your business is great. It's great that you offer a valuable and much needed service. It's great that you can work on and provide products for other Cruiser fans and make a living in the process. The original basis for this post was to show that just because you pay to have it done, doesn't mean that you can't do it yourself. Tuneups do not always prevent belt failures. New matched OEM belt sets that are installed correctly sometimes fail. Also, a reliable 350 is often less expensive to operate over the long run. Once again, I appreciate your posts and don't have a desire to make enemies. I felt that more questions could have been asked before a blanket statement was made regarding "tuneups" and "ignorance equaling dollars". Although ignorance does often equal dollars, it did not apply to this situation. I have no quarrel with you as I feel that you were uniformed regarding the full situation and made a statement off the cuff. Yes, I took it too seriously, but we all have pride issues at times. I'm not perfect. I don't know everything. I spend time on the board to contribute where and when I can and to gain valuable information from people like you, Slee, and others. I work hard for what I have and maintain my equipment with a religious fervor. Like I said before, water under the bridge. I wish for happiness for you and your family. :cheers:
 
Last edited:
3FE works great for me on backroads or constant interstate spead - cruises at 85 nicely. But as soon as I hook up to a 2000lbs boat/trailer, it struggles hard.

Been wondering lately if I can stuff a supercoupe supercharger/ intercooler somewhere in there. Anyway, when it gets tired, it wll be getting replaced with a small block. Not that I'm a huge SBC fan, the vortec intake manifold gaskets are a problem and the mains like to rattle on start up, but it's sized better for the job.

I drove a 454 powered chevy for a while and really liked it. It had 230 on the clock and acted strong too. Gas was single digits at times though.

I will plug a bit for ford though. I really enjoyed my 85 bronco. It was pretty capable off road. However, the body rattled something terrible, the front TTB wasn't as durable as a solid front, and the T19 tranny sucked. I would love to have 78-79 Bronco with a decent drivetrain, but only as a trail ride.

The 62 does me just fine as a do it all vehicle.
 
I think there is a reason that jeeps are nicknamed heeps. Everyone that I know that has had one has had problems with them. I have a fj60 that I have never had any major problems with. It might be slow and uncomfortable but I love my cruiser. When my friends with jeeps ask me to 4x4in I think its so they have someone to pull them out when they get stuck. :D
 
If we're talking about powerplants, I think we're missing the point.
The 2F motors were designed to reach max torque at low rpm, 1800. V8's generally don't reach peak torque until about 3200 rpms. All things being equal.

The 2F's were designed to go slow (straight 6's generally pull better at low rpm's than 8's). At high speeds, the F is way over their torque curve. That's how they were designed; for "expedition", not to drive fast, nor to pull trailers.

My point is, If you want modern highway and trailer pulling type comfort, then a V8 is the way to go.

We've seen those stupid commercials where two trucks are chained together end to end trying to outpull the other. In that kind of pulling, I'd rather have a motor that gives me the highest torque at the lowest rpm's. The 2F's will twist 220 lbs/ft at 1800 rpm's or so. V8's peak at more total torque but how about at low rpm's where the 2f's and like motors shine?

Apples and oranges, pick the one that works best for you.
 
straight six

Has there been a bad straight six made? I am sure there has but I can't think of one. Ford 300, Chev 250. 2F-looks like a Chevy to me. Jeep 258, 242. Mercedes-m180, etc. I think they are all pretty good. Every goofus who hates jeeps and Chevrolets must hang out here.
It's funny here to say they were designed for hard use in primitive environments. Looks like they copied about everything that worked good on other manufacturers rigs. I can't believe I don't have a life and am engaging in this...over and over...
 
Sorry Dog:
"3FE works great for me on backroads or constant interstate spead - cruises at 85 nicely. But as soon as I hook up to a 2000lbs boat/trailer, it struggles hard.
Been wondering lately if I can stuff a supercoupe supercharger/ intercooler somewhere in there."

I've seen a turbo installed on an 80 series 3FE. I went for a ride in it and it pulled like a V-8, but with low end torque. The 3FE low end was present, but kicking up the rpm set the turbo in motion, putting you back in the seat. An unfamiliar feeling with a 3FE! Ben Swain who works with Slee had a FJ80 (91 I believe), that had a custom one-off speced turbo. I believe that a friend of his worked for a turbo shop, they rigged up a system with adjustable boost, and the unit had a spool down timer to allow for cooling after the engine had shut off. It would run the turbo down to keep it from cooking. He did his homework on the system and it was pretty impressive. That and the custom lift (about 6-8"). I'm not sure what the tire size was, but I seem to recall them being 38's. Having a stock truck with just the ARB, I was mighty impressed with his reengineering of the engine and suspension. This was 4-5 years ago, well before J springs and the stuff that's available today. Nobody on the 80's cool list had anything like it in creative design except maybe Alan Podvin who had put a Vette LS-1 in his ride, or a few others who were pushing the envelope. Now, where does that leave us today? I know a lot of people who would be interested in kicking up the ole' 155 hp spec, but how much demand for 5 years of 3FE production really exists? 3 years of 62's and 2 years of FJ80's might not warrant r&d, marketing, and production of a complex technology. On the other hand, maybe Swain would let some enterprising person know where to start on such a project. He's remained pretty quiet on the subject and his association with Slee might keep him too occupied with other projects to pursue this avenue. I don't know the ultimate results of his experiment, but it might be worth asking. He told me he'd never install a 350 in an 80 series. He has faith in the Toyota mills and was willing to push the boundaries to make that untapped power possible. Just an interesting thought. Good luck.
 
Back
Top Bottom