I was looking at the BFG website comparing the AT/KO and KM2/MT tires and noticed a comparison for fuel economy. It shows the KM2/MT has more rolling resistance than the KO/AT tire. The 0 - 10 scale shows the KO/AT with a 6 and the KM2/MT with a 4!
That is equal to a 20% drop in fuel "Efficiency" per BFG! Pretty big IMHO!
My question, has anyone switched from KO's to KM2's and noticed a big drop in fuel mileage? If yes. I hope it was not 20%? What has been some real world experiences between these 2 tires?
I am getting a set of taller tires for a little more rubber overdrive, but saw this and was concerned. I'm not a hardcore off roader, but lots of dirt roads, rocks and sand, but with a little snow too (I have good chains so KM2 are OK).
Thanks
Doug
That is equal to a 20% drop in fuel "Efficiency" per BFG! Pretty big IMHO!
My question, has anyone switched from KO's to KM2's and noticed a big drop in fuel mileage? If yes. I hope it was not 20%? What has been some real world experiences between these 2 tires?
I am getting a set of taller tires for a little more rubber overdrive, but saw this and was concerned. I'm not a hardcore off roader, but lots of dirt roads, rocks and sand, but with a little snow too (I have good chains so KM2 are OK).
Thanks
Doug