No subscription is good but satpaq uses two satellites and only covers the US and territorial satellites. The satelites are geostationary and so 23,000 miles away and will require more device power to communicate. So I wonder about battery life.
The Inreach uses the Iridium system, a constellation of 82 satellites that forms a mesh for reliability. Iridium offer worldwide coverage and because the satellites are in lower orbit (482 miles), it requires much less power for the device to communicate.
I would go with Inreach.
yep, all correct and valid points. i think it depends on the use case(s). been eying the garmin/inreach and the reason i went satpaq is the following:
main use cases:
- off-roading in vehicle with power source (e.g., Moab etc.)
- weekend back country skiing, mountain biking, and hiking/camping
additional criteria:
- light weight (satpaq, inreach mini, spot gen 3)
- no subscription fees (satpaq)
- two-way messaging (inreach+, spot x, satpaq)
- sync to phone (inreach mini, satpaq)
ideally, it would have more broader usage area (read in some forum that they are planning on offering a worldwide version at the end of 2019 with a trade-in) but wanted something now for the above use cases.
just tried it mountain biking, but haven't done more extensive testing yet. but so far it seems to meet my needs (pending battery life and more rugged assessment)