more sled dog propaganda --

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Joined
Mar 28, 2003
Threads
219
Messages
2,028
Can't these dogs be adopted out as pets, or are the sledded dogs too gamey or something else (this is a legitimate question) --

Report: Unwanted Aspen Sled Dogs Shot In Head
Owner Defends Selective Culling Procedure

POSTED: 12:12 pm EDT April 4, 2005

ASPEN, Colo. -- The largest tourist dog sledding operation in the United States has admitted to an Aspen, Colo., newspaper that unwanted sled dogs not given up for adoption are shot in the back of the head and buried in a pit.

The practice is legal under Colorado law, even though some of the dogs that are killed are healthy, the Aspen Daily News reported in its Monday editions.

A former musher at the Krabloonik dog sledding center told the Daily News that he saw dogs shot annually during the years he worked there and that one year, 35 dogs were shot and killed in the culling process.

"I still lose sleep over it at night. I was part of it," Harry Portland told the newspaper.

As many as 250 dogs live at the sledding center and owner Dan MacEachen said dogs are killed with a .22-caliber rifle and buried in a pit after being covered with lime. The same pit is also used to bury collected excrement from the dogs.

MacEachen told the Daily News it happens every year. He also said older dogs are the ones primarily euthanized, but pups and younger dogs incapable of pulling sleds have been killed if homes can't be found for them.

A former employee who worked at Krabloonik in the 1990s told the newspaper that the first year he worked there 27 dogs were shot and tossed into the pit.

The state veterinarian's office said killing dogs by shooting them in the head is within the law, which considers an animal and individual's property that can be euthanized at any time -- provided it is done humanely.

Distributed by Internet Broadcasting Systems, Inc. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

http://www.wftv.com/news/4343579/detail.html
 
erics_bruisers said:
Can't these dogs be adopted out as pets, or are the sledded dogs too gamey or something else (this is a legitimate question) --

Report: Unwanted Aspen Sled Dogs Shot In Head
Owner Defends Selective Culling Procedure

POSTED: 12:12 pm EDT April 4, 2005

ASPEN, Colo. -- The largest tourist dog sledding operation in the United States has admitted to an Aspen, Colo., newspaper that unwanted sled dogs not given up for adoption are shot in the back of the head and buried in a pit.

The practice is legal under Colorado law, even though some of the dogs that are killed are healthy, the Aspen Daily News reported in its Monday editions.

A former musher at the Krabloonik dog sledding center told the Daily News that he saw dogs shot annually during the years he worked there and that one year, 35 dogs were shot and killed in the culling process.

"I still lose sleep over it at night. I was part of it," Harry Portland told the newspaper.

As many as 250 dogs live at the sledding center and owner Dan MacEachen said dogs are killed with a .22-caliber rifle and buried in a pit after being covered with lime. The same pit is also used to bury collected excrement from the dogs.

MacEachen told the Daily News it happens every year. He also said older dogs are the ones primarily euthanized, but pups and younger dogs incapable of pulling sleds have been killed if homes can't be found for them.

A former employee who worked at Krabloonik in the 1990s told the newspaper that the first year he worked there 27 dogs were shot and tossed into the pit.

The state veterinarian's office said killing dogs by shooting them in the head is within the law, which considers an animal and individual's property that can be euthanized at any time -- provided it is done humanely.

Distributed by Internet Broadcasting Systems, Inc. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

http://www.wftv.com/news/4343579/detail.html
fairly feekin sick I'd say. My wife just spent $300 on her 13 year old cat. " Older cat make up." Kidneys, urine blood etc. WOW I thought kids were expensive... they are! We would gladly take two or three of the Colorado dogs.
 
Throttleman_610 said:
fairly feekin sick I'd say. My wife just spent $300 on her 13 year old cat. " Older cat make up." Kidneys, urine blood etc. WOW I thought kids were expensive... they are! We would gladly take two or three of the Colorado dogs.


Early last year, I dropped over a grand on my eleven year old Rott for diagnostic tests to see if had cancer. This was right after our son was born. Wife wasn't real happy about it, but she understood.
 
i always wish i had that vet pet insurance, but that stuff isn't cheap, either --

-- who knows --

e
 
it's amazing how people have differing views on this stuff --

-- my friend's boss took his cat to the vet -- cat needed $500 of work, with 100% chance of survival --

-- the boss said, "put her to sleep, that's too much" --

-- well, they didn't "put her to sleep" -- they killed her --

-- it would be hard being that vet, that's for sure --

e
 
erics_bruisers said:
it's amazing how people have differing views on this stuff --

-- my friend's boss took his cat to the vet -- cat needed $500 of work, with 100% chance of survival --

-- the boss said, "put her to sleep, that's too much" --

-- well, they didn't "put her to sleep" -- they killed her --

-- it would be hard being that vet, that's for sure --

e

This is just me but I wouldnt spend $10 bucks to save a cat.

Maybe it was the way I was raised but dogs and cats are animals not people. Plain and simple. Yes they are good companions (well dogs atleast) but they are just animals. Just because we get so emotionaly attached to them doesnt make them human no matter how much people want them to be.

I had a friend who said her 2 pomeranians (SP?) were her "childeren" and that she loved them and took them everywhere with her. And she said that they were just as much work as real children (not having any real children of her own). And I told here time and time again that it was nothing compared to having real kids. Finaly a few years went by and she had a daughter and came up to me and said that the dogs were nothing like her daughther. Either in how much 'work' they were or in how she was emmotionaly attached to them.

These are pets and not people. I cant justify spending $1000 on medical bills for any animal less of a horse and that is only because the damn things cost so much in the first place. Pet is a glorified word for a domestic animal.

Now I am sure I wont make many friends by saying and I am sorry if I offend some. But this is how I feel.

my .02
 
Yeah but when my little greta broke her leg 3k was nothing for the next 15+ years i'll get with her. Good dog and just beginning her life. I agree on the cats though.

I lived in snowmass for a bit and I knew there was always something a bit shady with Krabloonik.
 
I understand both sides of the "to spend" and "not to spend" on your pets argument. Luckily, I've had healthy pets so I haven't had to cross this bridge yet...but I have a couple aging dogs that will put me to the test.

As for the gaminess of the sledded dogs and whether or not they could be eaten...I'm betting that Eric's NOT suggesting that they be harvested for culinary purposes rather than be thrown into pit (waste not, want not?)...so I'll ignore that portion of his question.

All I know about dog-sled racing is what I read about in "Winterdance" by Gary Paulsen, so I don't know if these dogs would make good house pets or not. Perhaps they could. The book didn't cover culling.

Rather than a .22, I would hope that someone would offer to take the dogs in and find homes for them. Shooting healthy dogs...regardless of the reason or legality just isn't right.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom