I can't believe I'm siding with Pagemaster here

Once again I think you are misinterpreting "light duty" and "reliability and dependability" off road.
Yes, many 70, 90, 120 and 150 series Land Cruisers are lighter in weight, have less payload capacity than the 100 and 200 series, but that does not make them any less qualified to tackle very difficult off road situations. They may even have lighter duty parts underneath because they do not need to support as much weight.
Remember, all of these vehicles are Land Cruisers.
As for the current Hilux, it is a relative of the Land Cruiser Prado and in many respects is much more practical for off road applications than the Land Cruiser. It is cost effective, fuel efficient, very easily modified, nimble in size with lots of payload room, and bulletproof. It has been used on many extreme expeditions around the world. Unfortunately the LC 100 and especially the 200 are growing so big they are becoming unwieldy in certain off road situations.
The LC 80 used to be the go to vehicle for difficult expeditions, now the Hilux is a strong contender. Don't get me wrong, I love my 100 series and count the days till I can own a 200. They are some of the most reliable and best built vehicles in the world that are made to withstand amazing abuse. That being said, these days, there are other excellent options for serious off road expeditions.
The picture below is from the current home page from the http://www.overlandjournal.com/
Edit: Ok...... I've been thinking about this, and if we where to compare fully stock vehicles, no mods whatsoever. I'd put the 100 or 200 series as the top contender for a ready made expedition rig. I'd put the Hilux 2nd, then the Prado. I still agree with what I said above.
.
Last edited: