Definitely going turbo, should get started on it next week. I have been just waiting for all the parts to show up. I have a build thread started if you're interested.
Builds DIY FJZ80 Low Budget Turbo Build (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter lilevo
- Start date
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
- Thread starter
- #322
editt
- Thread starter
- #323
Dyno numbers are in.
Stock 153hp 219tq
Turbo 295hp 357tq
On the dyno chart, stock and turbo are both overlayed
Much more details and videos to follow
Stock 153hp 219tq
Turbo 295hp 357tq
On the dyno chart, stock and turbo are both overlayed
Much more details and videos to follow
Last edited:
Awesome! That is exactly what I am looking for my goal was 300-320 awhp! Thanks for the good news!
Tapage
Club 4X4 Panamá
close to 60 hp but 130 lb/p torque .. !!! that sounds appealing ..
Tapage not sure where you're getting the 60hp, the peaks are 153hp NA and 295hp Turbo so more than 140hp more, almost double the power to the wheels! 
Nice work.
Sweet! Job well done
Lilevo,
Where was your limiting factor? Injector size?
Where was your limiting factor? Injector size?
That's what i was wondering... seems like no matter what size MAF or MAF housing he threw at it or computer tuning, it would go lean until he put in a larger injector.
- Thread starter
- #331
You need a minimum of 450cc injectors for anything like this.
That is what I was asking did you max out your IDC on the 450cc injectors at 295hp?
Tapage
Club 4X4 Panamá
Tapage not sure where you're getting the 60hp, the peaks are 153hp NA and 295hp Turbo so more than 140hp more, almost double the power to the wheels!
woopsy .. damn I'm getting old without my glasses ..
- Thread starter
- #334
8.7psi was 285hp 339tq
10.5psi was 295hp 357tq
No limit on injectors yet since the truck is still pegging 10.0 rich around 4400-5000RPM despite attempting to pull out more and more fuel. I just gave up and lived with it. It was 10.8-11 AFR up until 4500RPM then it pegged full rich.
I didn't want to try more boost still being on stock head bolts although I probably could have cracked 300hp easily.
I also dynoed my car that I trailered there with the truck. The car made:
22psi = 510hp, 398tq
45psi = 744hp, 566tq
Video: http://youtu.be/l1gU8DXs5Yg
10.5psi was 295hp 357tq
No limit on injectors yet since the truck is still pegging 10.0 rich around 4400-5000RPM despite attempting to pull out more and more fuel. I just gave up and lived with it. It was 10.8-11 AFR up until 4500RPM then it pegged full rich.
I didn't want to try more boost still being on stock head bolts although I probably could have cracked 300hp easily.
I also dynoed my car that I trailered there with the truck. The car made:
22psi = 510hp, 398tq
45psi = 744hp, 566tq
Video: http://youtu.be/l1gU8DXs5Yg
Last edited:
Very nice work! That 6466 seems to be a killer turbo. Do you have a dyno chart for the car? It's a 2L right? I was thinking a single 6466 on my 4L 1UZFE for a moderate power track car.
- Thread starter
- #336
I posted an overlay of my car and the LC stock either on this thread or another dyno thread.
Damn man! I can only imagine how much fun that beast would be to drive with all that power on stock tires and stock ride height.
- Thread starter
- #338
Oh yeah forgot to mention the non turbo run was done on stock tires. The turbo pulls were on 285/75/16s.
Not sure how much that would sway the results.
Not sure how much that would sway the results.
- Thread starter
- #339
Azca
If there is a harder way - I will find it...
Not being an expert but it sure seems like the numbers are low until you are well over 4000 RPM. Most off road work is done well under this, towing may use the higher RPM range but running your vehicle at over 6500 RPM to reach these numbers for any length of time seems that it would be a lot of stress on an engine. As for a stupid question, was the graph plotted correctly? I only ask because it starts at 2750 RPM. I would have thought it would start at idle, roughly 700 RPM. 
Please understand that I am not trying to be critical of your work, critics are a dime a dozen and lord knows I would LOVE to be able to do everything you have, let alone understand it. Is there a way to drop the max numbers down and broaden the power curve so the torque peaks earlier?
I would also be curious to see where the stock vehicle was on this graph vs the one above.
On the others side of the coin HOLLY C***! Those are monster numbers, especially considering it was done on 33s! And that is at the rear wheels, true engine output must be closer to 850 HP. and 650 lbs of torque, that puts the newest vette to shame!
Bottom line is a job well done 
Please understand that I am not trying to be critical of your work, critics are a dime a dozen and lord knows I would LOVE to be able to do everything you have, let alone understand it. Is there a way to drop the max numbers down and broaden the power curve so the torque peaks earlier?
I would also be curious to see where the stock vehicle was on this graph vs the one above.
On the others side of the coin HOLLY C***! Those are monster numbers, especially considering it was done on 33s! And that is at the rear wheels, true engine output must be closer to 850 HP. and 650 lbs of torque, that puts the newest vette to shame!
Bottom line is a job well done 
