4Wheelparts ORA glossy ad rubbish (1 Viewer)

[FlatlandTRD]

So does anyone else get this fancy-glossy pseudo magazine? BTW, they love heeps and bolt-ons. I will admit though, when I needed a snatch-block fast, they were the only ones who had them in stock, because let's face it, their customers aren't wheeling or getting their shiny black wheels and LEDs dirty
Anyways, in the most recent rubbish on page 24, they yammer on about the 10 Best Budget 4x4s and include the 80! But then they reference a pic of a 100, and blather on that basically you'll have better luck winning the lottery than finding one at a reasonable price (editorial liberties taken).

At least their review of the Tacoma was close. I mean 1995.5 vs 1996 is close enough, and never mind the 2.7 4cyl option, or the rear locker.

And as a former Bronco owner, the 351 was offered well before 1992. Alright, I feel slightly better, carry on

 

[cjmoon]

While I don't disagree completely. Most of your Claims are 100% true, and I'll remind them of that when there mounting new wheels cheaper than any one in town with gear not avalible any where else on the quick..

There bronco/ford comments are saying. 92-96 is the best expecially if it's the 351... the rest of your points are ridiculous, they have no pride.

 

[1MAC]

It is handy to have an ARB dealer a few miles from my house that also doesn't charge tax or shipping. If I get a bumper, that's probably where I'll go.