Okay, but if you are supposed to test the ABS actuator any time you do a major brake job (which might introduce air into the lines) then you are in essence bleeding it.
Really you
shouldn't get air into the ABS actuator unless you open up the lines near it, or really really really try hard to get air into the lines. Even if you run the master cylinder dry you won't get air into the ABS actuator (at least not right away). I've tried.
From what I remember of reading the FSM last night, I don't recall it saying that testing the ABS actuator is required after a major brake job. If that were the case, are there guidelines as to what constitutes a major brake job?
With many people I'd probably agree with you. OTOH folks like Brian seem to be a little OCD when it comes to their vehicle, and if they are anything like me they didn't let it out of their sight. Maybe they can chime in.
But perhaps you'd like to explain why bleeding the brakes repeatedly (including with power/vacuum bleeders), adjusting everything possible, etc, no improvement was seen. Then they take it down to the dealership, ask them to use the ABS bleed function, and see immediate improvement. The dealer obviously did something that they were not capable of. Considering that many of the people who posted on that thread know thier stuff, I can't imagine what else it could be other than the ABS tool, the only tool that they did not have access to.
You offer no other explanation for the sudden (and drastic) improvement in braking, but insist that it cannot be the ABS. Well if it's not the ABS, then what else is it?
Sounds like we're all in the same club. I had to trade trucks with a friend the other night so I could get his winter tires put on, and I was more worried about my "baby" getting home than I was about getting to the garage in 12" of snow driving an F150 with slick summer tires



. I want to be clear, my intentions are not to knock anyone for anything, I just want to clear up what I believe is a big misconception about brake bleeding on these trucks. I also don't want to be the next Sumotoy

so please stop me if I start to sound like him. Please!
I still believe that the ABS SST is not being used in the bleeding process on our trucks, even after a few people have requested it. One thing I want to point out is that there is a lot of leeway between customer and mechanic. I am not saying this is always the case, but it has been known to happen. The vast majority of customers that walk into a dealership know nothing more about cars than "get in, turn the key and drive. Oh, and once in a while I have to put gas in the hole behind that little door". Sad, but true. The service advisor's job is to sell services to these customers. Some advisors are great and will only sell you the services you actually need. Some of them, not so much. We've all heard the stories "I took my truck into the dealer for an oil change and now I need $2500 worth of work done! What do I doooooo?" Similar situation with mechanics. Some of them will just do the basic job and kick the car out, and some will actually take the time to read the FSM if they have questions and to ensure they do the job right, especially if they've never done it before. All this is to illustrate is that simply because you asked that the service be done, doesn't always guarantee that it is done exactly how you requested.
I read the thread again and I only saw one person who reported an improvement after the dealership supposedly used the SST. I wasn't there so I can't surmise what happened, but is it possible the dealer tightened a loose connection or just did a better job of bleeding? Did the previous shop know about the LSP&BV and the requirement to bleed it? Maybe the dealer did and that fixed it. I dunno (and again, I'm not knocking anyone).
I don't mean to be nit-picky, but I haven't seen any specific evidence of a sudden/drastic improvement in braking directly and solely related to using the SST. All the evidence I have seen/read/heard/discussed points me towards believing that the SST's only use on our trucks is to troubleshoot the actuator. Some of that is from the Technical Articles on this site:
Automotive Training and Resource Site. In the Brake series, articles 9, 10, and 11 all have info that is relevant to this discussion. I am still quite open to the possibility of being wrong about that and I will happily eat my hat (so to speak) if so.
This is probably more philosophical than technical, but something I wonder is why Toyota would equip their flagship vehicle, designed to drive to hell and back, with an ABS system that could essentially cripple it in the field? I think one of the things we all enjoy about these beasts is the ability to fix almost anything anywhere at anytime with limited tools so it seems odd to me that they would limit it like that.
pleasesayno,pleasesayno.... umm, did that sound to much like Sumo?

