- Thread starter
- #21
There is a lot of controversy over the weight. Its GVM is the same as an 80 but with all the extras it has cut the payload to almost passengers only.
I think Toyota need a rethink on where landcruiser is going especailly with cheap fuel gone forever.
I also think the rear axle being 100mm narrower sucks too ,but hopefully this will be rectified in the 09 update.
Snake Racing are selling spacers to bring the rear wheels out
I dont believe the Nissan is lacking power ,but I think they tried to wring too much from a 3.0 litre 4 cyl.
I think a straight 6 is the best all round engine shape but manufacturers want more efficient engine shapes to increase cabin room.
The guys at 4wd Action think the 105 could handle an engine swap with a diesel v8 asits chassi rails are wider than a 70![]()
Sometimes I think "what were they thinking". They have a good formula for building a good 4wd and then they "update" it and change things on it for changes sake. They are getting so far away from what made the LandCruiser name great they are risking losing customers by the shipload.
I like the D4D V8 and the Kinetic swaybars but some of the other changes are stupid.