so my wife drives a really nice limited Flex with the Ecoboost engine. it's AWD, loads of power and every single option- i'm talking vista skylight roof, adaptive cruise, park assist, a/c cooled seats, proximity sensors, 365 horse twin turbo (pretty rad to open that thing up from time to time.) yada yada. i think the sticker on it was like $45k. so pretty nice car, right? it's the second Flex we've owned and we really like the platform.
i bought my 04 lx about 6 weeks ago (after dreaming about it for five years, ever since i sold my '97 lx). i left it home for the weekend and took her flex up north to our cabin because it already had the kayak racks on it and we didn't feel like swapping them to the cruiser.
so the wife drives the cruiser all weekend, and i drive the flex up north. i kid you not, i couldn't WAIT to get back home and trade back. and i detected a distinct hesitation from her when it was time to trade keys.
i've come to the clear conclusion that my 13 year old truck with 175k on it is still A BETTER CAR than Ford's late model luxury flagship family hauler Flex (which for all intents and purposes, is a great car in it's own right). The ride, the fit and finish, the feel of the drivetrain and steering of the cruiser- all superior. the only thing it's lacking in comparison is some of the modern technology, but to be honest, i don't miss any of that when i'm driving the cruiser.
EDIT: i know they are two fundamentally different vehicles built for different purposes, so i'm more comparing the driving experience than anything else.
It's crazy to me that the 100, at more than three times the age and more that four times the mileage can still FEEL like the superior vehicle. It's a testament to the design and quality of the LC platform, but that's old news right?
so that's my observation, and i'm curious if anyone else here experiences the same feeling when comparing their 100 series to modern vehicles.
i bought my 04 lx about 6 weeks ago (after dreaming about it for five years, ever since i sold my '97 lx). i left it home for the weekend and took her flex up north to our cabin because it already had the kayak racks on it and we didn't feel like swapping them to the cruiser.
so the wife drives the cruiser all weekend, and i drive the flex up north. i kid you not, i couldn't WAIT to get back home and trade back. and i detected a distinct hesitation from her when it was time to trade keys.
i've come to the clear conclusion that my 13 year old truck with 175k on it is still A BETTER CAR than Ford's late model luxury flagship family hauler Flex (which for all intents and purposes, is a great car in it's own right). The ride, the fit and finish, the feel of the drivetrain and steering of the cruiser- all superior. the only thing it's lacking in comparison is some of the modern technology, but to be honest, i don't miss any of that when i'm driving the cruiser.
EDIT: i know they are two fundamentally different vehicles built for different purposes, so i'm more comparing the driving experience than anything else.
It's crazy to me that the 100, at more than three times the age and more that four times the mileage can still FEEL like the superior vehicle. It's a testament to the design and quality of the LC platform, but that's old news right?
so that's my observation, and i'm curious if anyone else here experiences the same feeling when comparing their 100 series to modern vehicles.
Last edited: