Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
It looks like the data you provided is for 703 rpm and AF lambda is 1 (oxygen balanced). Any data for 2500 rpm?@Mauser These pictures from my techstream are what I took from my vehicle. If you can replicate them from your gx470 that would be great.
View attachment 4081211
View attachment 4081212
View attachment 4081213
View attachment 4081214
This is good information, thanks for taking the time to help. What I really wanted to see was your MAF reading and your atmosphere measurement.The wife just got gome a little while ago so it was warm. It showed a vacuum leak that I didn't know about so probably won't help until I fix that. I hope you can see these. View attachment 4081241View attachment 4081242
I am at 7100This is good information, thanks for taking the time to help. What I really wanted to see was your MAF reading and your atmosphere measurement.
Your readings were taken 793 rpm and mine at 703 so that will be a little different but not too much. My MAF is reading at 3.34 and yours is at 5.00, My atmosphere pressure is 3 yours is -4, that is significant. My elevation is 7800 feet what is your elevation?
Here is a reading at 2400 rpm.It looks like the data you provided is for 703 rpm and AF lambda is 1 (oxygen balanced). Any data for 2500 rpm?
Wow so it seems like this is a significant difference I feel. You are at 7100 feet with a measured Atmospheric pressure of -3 on the last reading you posted. I am at 7800 with an atmospheric pressure of 3. Sure we are 700 difference but should the atmospheric pressures be this different.I am at 7100
I wanted to cross post from my build thread what I from this information. Could be something?I asked a club member to scan their gx470 with tech stream so I would have a local data set from a good running 2uz VVTI and as a bonus they also are running headers and deleted cats, so it is a very similar set up as mine.
The biggest difference in the test is I am at 7800 feet elevation and they are at 7100 feet elevation. Their data set was taken at 793 rpms and mine at 703 rpms.
I was focusing on the MAF and atmosphere pressure readings.
Their MAF was at 5 mine at 3.34
Their atmosphere pressure was -3 mine is 3.
It seems like these should not be this far off for only 700 feet in elevation.
If you have followed along you may have seen that I went down the atmosphere pressure rabbit hole already. The MAP sensor which is under the manifold is what measures the AP. I replaced the map sensor and added a new filter and reinstalled at that time it did not change this reading at all. I “moved on” thinking this was not the issue.
The last time I sent the harness back to Tim he deleted the wiring to the MAP sensor all together as part of the SAI delete. Yet without the sensor the reading is still the same. How?
Further reading the map sensor supposedly does provide information that is used to correct Fuel Trims. I am also guessing that if the air density (AP) measurement is off this probably skews the MAF calculation which could explain why it is off.
I need to talk to Tim to see how his ecu is receiving the MAP sensor input and calculating AP for the FT mixture.
I have gotten my hopes up in the past thinking I figured it out, I am not holding my breath this time either but it seems like there is something to this.
What about this?Wow so it seems like this is a significant difference I feel. You are at 7100 feet with a measured Atmospheric pressure of -3 on the last reading you posted. I am at 7800 with an atmospheric pressure of 3. Sure we are 700 difference but should the atmospheric pressures be this different.
I’m focusing on this Atmosphere pressure reading because someone else told me mine looked off in comparison to there’s but they were at a significantly lower elevation.
I will have to sift back through my thread and research but it was suggested if this measurement was off significantly it would affect how the ecu mixes the fuel ratio.
Any know for certain what sensor reads the atmosphere pressure. I recall researching this before but could not find the answer with certainty.
Wow so it seems like this is a significant difference I feel. You are at 7100 feet with a measured Atmospheric pressure of -3 on the last reading you posted. I am at 7800 with an atmospheric pressure of 3. Sure we are 700 difference but should the atmospheric pressures be this different.
I’m focusing on this Atmosphere pressure reading because someone else told me mine looked off in comparison to there’s but they were at a significantly lower elevation.
I will have to sift back through my thread and research but it was suggested if this measurement was off significantly it would affect how the ecu mixes the fuel ratio.
Any know for certain what sensor reads the atmosphere pressure. I recall researching this before but could not find the answer with certainty.
That is my picture. His readings were -3 and -4.Dennis,
his first screen shows 3 PSIG but the later screens show -4 PSIG, so this has me stumped.
View attachment 4081396
You will get no argument from me. While this was for my FJ40, it should not be hard to adapt to an FJ60.The 60 is living in the garage until the summer, where I may try to source a 3FE (there are two in ABQ on FB marketplace) and do a 2FE build myself.
Just saw this. Hope you're ok!!Driving to work this morning and this happened!
View attachment 4064090
I was able to walk away. Just need to get the T100 ready for the next demolition derby.![]()