It would be nice if it did have a Toyota engine but then the 2f is just a knock off of a really really old Chevy engine....
Nice!!
Face it people...2f=Turd
Now, if we had diesel in the U.S.A... then I would say keep it Toyota!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
It would be nice if it did have a Toyota engine but then the 2f is just a knock off of a really really old Chevy engine....
Face it people...2f=Turd
. I never would have believed it but he was kind enough to show me the radar. He also mentioned my "monster tires" (his words) might be a contributing factor to my speeding. I run 35's. The only positive thing out of my run in with the trooper was that he gave me a written warning
. I didn't know that 35's could throw my speedo off by such a large margin. While I was being stopped, I looked at the speedo and it showed 60mph.T-bones 60 said:While i would like the power of a V8, this doing 90 mph plus in a body on frame, straight axled, horse and buggy suspention, vehicle does not sound like a safe idea. This is why I have a Toyota powed Lexus V8 that does well over 100 safely. Cruisers were not designed for high speeds regardless of what power plant you have in them.
Why every 60 should have a v8
.
. Have you ever tried to get on the freeway with a straight 6 Cruiser motor?
.
What size tires are you running? What gear ratio in the differentials?
all the time.it's really not that hard. that sign at the end of the ramp means merge not stop.
brian said:all the time.it's really not that hard. that sign at the end of the ramp means merge not stop.
I'd just like to point out that for trail running, a V8 is going to be easier to kill with low RPMs, as well as being considerably louder, and use more gas than a 2F when you're crawling over rocks and washouts for hours on end.
It's called an automatic transmission. Can crawl slower than any 2f-4spd.
Now, here's the question: do you really want to spend a bunch of money to make your 60 faster on pavement and better for towing, if it's going to be less practical on the trail?
v8 is more practical... and yes I like roadtrips and overland travel. The v8 makes driving the FJ60 actually pleasurable and practical
For some (i.e. people whose wheeling mostly consists of mud, sand, or snow), that's actually a good tradeoff. For me, it definitely wouldn't be worthwhile. I don't have anything to tow, I don't like my rig to sound like a hotrod in the pristine wilderness, and I am constantly surprised by how often I need to crawl along at 500 rpms in 1st gear low range.\
A stock muffler solves the sound issue. You speak of "pristine wilderness"... you just drove through it in a highly polluting vehicle. v8 is at least 2x cleaner than the 2f. And most people desmog, etc making the 2f even worse. So if you really care about pristine wilderness, you should be on a mountain bike.
Now, if I was going to do a lot of dune-bashing, aggressive highway driving, and had a boat to tow around, I wouldn't spend the $6k+ to do a V8 conversion properly in my 60; I'd get a 100-series for $10k or so, and it'd be ready for all of that out of the box, with its V8 and beefy IFS. Of course, it would look like a minivan, but that's just personal preference.

We all have money-pits and are proud of it!
My v8 /4l60e crawls 10x better than the 2f and 4spd.