This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
I picked up a set of 2022 Tundra rotors for the setup I am putting together. 6 lug and 353mm diameter. Hub bore had to be opened up from 98mm to 112mm, but otherwise the height and thickness of the rotor matches the 200 series rotor.
Nice, so did you fit the Wilwood to 17's or are you getting the 4runner OEM calipers to work? With the new hydroboost setup I went with, these brakes are amazing.
Just placed the order for the Wilwood FNSL6 calipers today and will be trying to stuff them under my 17's. I'm estimating that I'll be able to tear into the rig in a couple weeks so we'll see how good my measurements were haha. Thanks again for doing all the R&D
Good deal, that would really open up this conversion to a lot more people especially if the newer 6 hole rotors work. More important you don't have a few expensive paperweights!
Well, they're 6-lug already which is nice. And as far as I can tell, they're pretty much identical dimensionally to the later model 200 (16+) and Tundra rotors which makes them *just* too big to fit with the calipers we're using...
Truth to this?
Updates?
Been looking at those and tarox. Tarox runs a little bit cheaper.
I like the tethered valve stem caps, got a link or name ? thanks
They're the Apex Rapid Precision Valves. Allows deflation in a significantly shorter time
There's a similar relation to speed vs the extra weight some of our 80's have. Now I won't have an exact formula to convert x amount of speed = y amount of extra weight. But both in the end are extra load on the braking system. Also keep in mind these brakes are designed for environments 30 years ago. We're driving faster, with more cars on the road now more than ever, and the need to modernize the brakes is highly prominent. Look at all the brakes on modern 4500lb+ SUV's, Trucks, or even large sedans/wagons. There are crossover's that have better braking system than our 3 decade old 80's.
Yea totally get it (I track a heavy, high HP M car), but I think a comparison with quantifiable data is helpful. Even relatively comparable stopping distance between stock and a built rig with a bbk would be crazy, with all that extra weight. 10-15 feet more would be pretty good honestly from that speed. And tires make a huge difference in stopping my distance as well of course. I was just hoping there was some sort of comparison to before/after or against stock. I’ll check out the other thread as well.There's a similar relation to speed vs the extra weight some of our 80's have. Now I won't have an exact formula to convert x amount of speed = y amount of extra weight. But both in the end are extra load on the braking system. Also keep in mind these brakes are designed for environments 30 years ago. We're driving faster, with more cars on the road now more than ever, and the need to modernize the brakes is highly prominent. Look at all the brakes on modern 4500lb+ SUV's, Trucks, or even large sedans/wagons. There are crossover's that have better braking system than our 3 decade old 80's.
I've gone through calculating optimal brake bias for my vehicle, and you can't have a balanced brake system by increasing front braking power and not address the rear accordingly. I have very lengthy and more detailed info on my big brake thread if you feel like having a gander.
