Does anyone think that the longer lengths of the already tested Tundra conversion would create too much leverage for the pressure of the AHC to still function properly with longevity?
To the suspension, it wouldn't be much different then say, adding a front bumper. It's just more load. The front end in particular is capable of handling more load while maintaining flat cornering and minimal brake dive, as it implements two spring rates that it can dynamically switch between. You can also augment the front for more load via the tundra spring spacers, or perhaps source diesel LX450d AHC springs from overseas. Perhaps the aftermarket may eventually offer something, but it's pretty robust to handling more load even stock.