I'm assuming he was just too high-centered to get traction even with A-TRAC. A couple of "well" placed rocks will leave nearly any vehicle hosed.
Seems likely, but that's not what Mark described on post 159.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
I'm assuming he was just too high-centered to get traction even with A-TRAC. A couple of "well" placed rocks will leave nearly any vehicle hosed.
I'm assuming he was just too high-centered to get traction even with A-TRAC. A couple of "well" placed rocks will leave nearly any vehicle hosed.
^^^ Could not agree more with this. But surely you'll keep your 200 around right? I'm a 6-12 month vehicle guy too usually, but I'm committed to my '15 LC as far into the future as I can see.
But now that Mark has 35's, I have to keep up with the Jones' and get 35's too.
FWIW on the 35's: a lot of the trails we've been scoping out for LCDC have some BIG rocks. @kevinfoutch and I rolled through a few on my sxs where I was thinking I would probably not take my LC (and I'm crazy if you've wheeled with me, I will go anywhere.) On those trails though 35's (even vs. 33's) would make a huge difference in clearing obstacles. Of course, Grizzly Lake is a trail that's only for the mentally unstable.
@steenh is right on with my same concerns though with 35's - you do lose articulation, which is one of the LC 200's main party tricks. That rear axle is magic! You also are raising your CoG by that much, and when you're off-camber with a higher CoG and if you have a heavy roof rack...all that stuff adds up.
But these trucks look right at home on 35's, and every mod has a tradeoff doesn't it?
Rubicon=underarmor
Kinda going off what is being talked about with articulation, traction, and 35s for big rock crawling trails.
I've got timbens in the garage that came from another truck, I put those on the 200 a while ago to see about fitting 35s. But, for the same reason they always come off of every truck I put them on, they limit flex A LOT. From my opinion, I can safely go on harder trails, by staying flatter with about 2" more front end flex, than being .6" taller from Marks 34.7 over my 33.5 tires.
Now with lockers, yea, doesn't matter how little weight is sitting on the tire, you'll get traction.
But Mark, when we run the Rubicon like we've talked about, I'm just going to say it now, I'm not hating you know that, but I think you are going to feel more uneasy because of what is required to put a 35 in a 200
Just to be clear...the undershorts are of Slee's bumper. But ya, I'm definitely happy with the TJM!