What Pacer saidThere is no such thing. You could of course prove me wrong by providing a link.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
What Pacer saidThere is no such thing. You could of course prove me wrong by providing a link.
So I'd return starter, keep Tees and coolant (assuming it was new).You are correct, $825 was the entire job...but it is now a sunk cost...the part was $265, had heater tees also done...so, you are correct...
BTW @Pacer: That "Hoovies" guy needs a TV spot, he's entertaining... LOL
Price of the LC? Do you do any offroading? The '06 is going to have ATRAC so it will do better offroad. The mileage is not a big deal if it is well maintained. I imagine the LC is going to cost way more than you can sell the LX for, so this will likely be a personal choice.
So, I picked up the LX today, runs great, no leaks, knocks bumps or shimmies that I can tell. Here is my dilemma, I now have a 1999 LX with 116K on the clock, and a baselined motor. There are a few little items that need attention (VERY slow brake leak somewhere) and it is an LX, so at some point I will have to have the AHC serviced. I have found a '06 LC that has 160K on the clock, and very detailed service records...I prefer the color on the '06, and I also prefer that it is an LC vs LX. As far as options go, they are almost identical. However, I am giving up 44K miles...and I will take a pretty good hit on my LX if I sell it. I think the thing that concerns me is something else going wrong with the LX. I probably drive the truck 6K/year.
Should I keep the '99, or pick up the '06?
Personally I would keep the LX because I don't have the extra money to spend. The '06 has VVTI which makes more power, but some prefer the simplicity of the other motor. If money was no object I'd be looking at an 06 or 07 LC with perfect service records .The LC is in the $17K range...I WILL NOT get anywhere close to that with the LX. My intention is to at least go look at the LC, drive it...and see what sort of deal we can make.
^^^As the OP, please let me clear up the "irregularities", first off, the LX was towed to a shop, so not running...after the starter replacement, the rod was thrown, was this the mechanics fault? Probably...Why would you put all that money into a perfectly good baselined truck, more than you could get out of it, then walk away from it at a big lots just because you like the way an LC looks over an LX? There were some oddities in this post that I noticed before, like the willingness to pay for stuff that wasn't the OP's fault.. but this just strikes me as being irregular.
Actually, thinking more about keeping the '99, on the drive home it felt good and familiar...and I know all the quirks. I built a 1967 Ford Bronco when I was station in NV and drove it back across the country when I PCS'd to Virginia...I knew that rig inside and out...there is something to be said for that. And you are correct...either will be a great vehicle...As for your current rig, I suspect it will be a good truck for a really long time. Sounds like you are trying to talk yourself into buying the newer truck.
Actually, thinking more about keeping the '99, on the drive home it felt good and familiar...and I know all the quirks. I built a 1967 Ford Bronco when I was station in NV and drove it back across the country when I PCS'd to Virginia...I knew that rig inside and out...there is something to be said for that. And you are correct...either will be a great vehicle...