What have you done to your 200 Series this week? (18 Viewers)

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Nice! I played with an attic and coudln't get it to my liking. Good job there!

What does the Kaon anchors look like? If there were a way to get another set of anchors spaced further apart than just the two handle positions, that would be the ticket for me to try again.
Why not just use the handle anchors to hold an aluminum rod to have the spaced out anchor points on either side.
 
Why not just use the handle anchors to hold an aluminum rod to have the spaced out anchor points on either side.

That could totally work. Will noodle on that. Meat on the bone for future tinkering.
 
What does the Kaon anchors look like? If there were a way to get another set of anchors spaced further apart than just the two handle positions, that would be the ticket for me to try again.
Watch from 2:20 on and you can see how their anchors work and what they look like. To make another set of anchors, you'd have to be good with a dremel and cut out a small square from the headliner and another from the metal behind it.



Before the parts came in, I wasn't sure if it was going to be wide enough for what I wanted. My back up plan was to buy some half inch aluminum angle in my preferred length and make a rigid end support similar to what @lx200inAR is talking about. You would just have to use some spacers between the angle and the headliner to make up the recessed area for the grab handle.


Holes are for anchor bolts and slots would be for the webbing. If someone doesn't want to cut the slots, attaching some footman loops to the angle would work as well. One benefit of this method is that you could flip the angle to position the attic a bit higher or lower depending on need.


angle.jpg
 
Popped a pre 16' knob into my heritage. I wanted a bit more wood around the cabin...not sure I like it though. May return.

IMG_5194.jpeg


IMG_5182.jpeg


IMG_5185.jpeg
 
Fitted strut spacers, a nice wee project for a few hours. Not so nice was torquing some of the bolts to 300nm, that's a fair grunt to tweak it up, and I need a bigger torque wrench so had to guess it.

Grubbins

1737249874613.png



Quickly out with the helper tube for extra leverage

1737249898384.png



Job done. A lift of 35mm. Can't drive the truck much till Monday as now really needs an alignment so it's booked in first thing. I think it'll settle/droop to about 25mm lift.

1737249919141.png

1737249940362.png
 
20211225_153412.jpg

Since we are on page 996
1737258870266.jpeg
 
Oil change and a deep cleaning of all the kids crap out of the middle row.

I really love this truck.
 
Banks Pedal Monster completely transforms the dead right foot in the 16+ LX. Feels like a peppy 2013 in PWR mode.

1737384979748.png


1737384992862.png
 
Isn't this just a "better version" of the Pedal Commander? My only gripe with this one is my understanding that it occupies the OBD2 port, which I prefer to use for OBDFusion gauges.
Banks uses the OBDII port for several reasons. One is power draw, the other for reverse sensing. You can read those and the comparison against the Pedal Commander here. In my research, Banks engineered this product very soundly.

Regarding your OBD Fusion, there are splitter cables you can buy. I've not tried one so I can't attest to the functionality. I too have ran OBD Fusion and have found it more of a distraction than a help. The 200 systems manage the truck well and there's no need for the supplemental data.

1737395537382.png
 
Banks uses the OBDII port for several reasons. One is power draw, the other for reverse sensing. You can read those and the comparison against the Pedal Commander here. In my research, Banks engineered this product very soundly.

Regarding your OBD Fusion, there are splitter cables you can buy. I've not tried one so I can't attest to the functionality. I too have ran OBD Fusion and have found it more of a distraction than a help. The 200 systems manage the truck well and there's no need for the supplemental data.

View attachment 3820244
I hadn't considered the splitter! Thank you for sharing. After looking into both, I came to the same conclusion: the BANKS option is superior. I may consider swapping it out at some point now.

I also agree, the truck handles everything just fine, but I like displaying via carplay trans temps when towing.
 
I'm curious about the impact to fuel mileage, but maybe it doesn't matter if the smile is big enough.
It might make a minor difference. On the one hand it will rev higher due to the mapped throttle position consuming more fuel. On the other, wider throttle openings reduce pumping losses and brisk (not full throttle) acceleration can improve economy slightly.

Brakes, wind resistance, and rolling resistance remain the biggest contributors to fuel consumption. Accelerate briskly but coast early before the light.
 
... I like displaying via carplay trans temps when towing.
I used to do the same. But then I realized that it was never an issue. Though typical loads for me are under 5,000 lbs. I'd rather have dash real estate for something else, like my Ham radio display.
 
Banks Pedal Monster completely transforms the dead right foot in the 16+ LX. Feels like a peppy 2013 in PWR mode.

View attachment 3820121

Interesting, I tried finding it online but Bankspower.com says not compatible with my 2017 LX. Do you have a model or part number?
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top Bottom