Hmmm, I actually have Thai filtered out so I don't see his posts (unless I want to, which I don't), but I saw this quoted in Longhorn's post (thanks man, why did you have to quote the guy and bring his drivel back into my plane of sight??? 
).
Technically, Thai is correct here. He has never overtly put down the Cruiser, either 80 or 100. Instead, he uses a clever mechanism whereby he brings up his G and then goes off about how superior it is the the 80 or 100. Doesn't say they're bad, just says the G is better. This, IMHO, is not merely defending his choice of truck, but going out of his way to say why it is better than ours. That is the fundamental difference and is out of place on a Land Cruiser forum, and also showcases his poor Netiquette. If he wants to go to some G forum and tout the superiority of his truck over the Cruiser to appease his small-phallus ego, then more power to him, I say!
).Technically, Thai is correct here. He has never overtly put down the Cruiser, either 80 or 100. Instead, he uses a clever mechanism whereby he brings up his G and then goes off about how superior it is the the 80 or 100. Doesn't say they're bad, just says the G is better. This, IMHO, is not merely defending his choice of truck, but going out of his way to say why it is better than ours. That is the fundamental difference and is out of place on a Land Cruiser forum, and also showcases his poor Netiquette. If he wants to go to some G forum and tout the superiority of his truck over the Cruiser to appease his small-phallus ego, then more power to him, I say!
And there were plenty of vehicles out there (lifted 4runners, GX, Hummers, etc.) that had a lot trouble. I guess that everyone on this forum is a professional off-roader. If so, then i bow to you guys.
