I thought it was a little funny too, but every little bit helps with weight in motion/subject to inertia.Mace said:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.
I thought it was a little funny too, but every little bit helps with weight in motion/subject to inertia.Mace said:
4x4Poet said:But I beg to differ on the SSBC/TLC calipers having no performance advantage over the foreskin calipers.
The aluminum calipers will:
1. dissipate heat better.
2. reduce unsprung weight.
3. are probably stiffer bodied to keep better pad alignment.
4. May produce less pad and rotor wear as a result of #1 and #3.
![]()
eshelbyk said:I've always heard, for rotors-
vented - good
slotted - good (?)
drilled - bad
Heat dissipation is quantifyable, but may not have a noticeable effect, as you say, for a Cruiser.dgangle said:1. It may. Beyond the material, mass, size, area, shape and design all come into play. Is this really quantifyable? We're talking about a 30+ year old utility vehicle, not a freekin race car.
Weight is also quantifyable. The slightly lighter weight could compensate a little for the higher than stock weight that comes with larger tires and rims. And this weight is [Edit: Mace2. I agree. But again, is this really quantifyable? I think more benefit per dollar could be achieved in this area by taking off the winch, heavy bumper, etc. What about that 150 lb oversized rim/tire$ If you want to reduce unsprung weight, the smaller tire/rim the better. I thought the whole marketing theory of these 'monster calpiers' was 'stops 35's like stock tires".
] UNsprung weight, so reducing even a pound adds up under motion/force. It's too bad all of us can't afford to go with bling, forged alum rims when we step up to big tires to bring the rim & tire combo weight back closer to stock to ease stress on the hub bearings and trunions. The trunions certainly benefit from any weight reduction though large tires would still increase leverage, the main enemy or trunions. So, lighter weight is a performance advantage, but minimal for sure. And your bumper & winch example is sprung weight– apples to oranges.I meant that the beefy alum bodies would keep caliper body warpage under heat and during clamping actions to a minimum. I wasn't refering to any mechanical concern. So, you're right from a mechanical serviceablity perspective. And maybe his Cruiser and driving style won't bring this performance advantage into play. I threw it out there anyway for the sake of the first looong downhill grade while towing something heavy.3. I disagree. Pad alignment? If you got pads wearing unevenly you gotta piston stuck and more serious problems than a bling caliper will fix.
I meant that the pads would probably wear longer than stock. I have no idea what the wear would be in comparison to 4 Runner calipers/pads. I should have differentiated between the two options over stock. Of course, I said "probably" because I don't know for sure. Just that less heat retained at the pads within stiff-bodied, heat-dissipating aluminum calipers should reduce wear since any increase in reatined heat at the pads makes the composite wear faster– assuming clamping force is equal.4. I disagree. In the real world a smaller pad will always wear faster as compaired to one with a larger area, assuming the same material. F=PXA. If the pressure stays the same and you increase the area the force is increased. How can you justify differently?![]()
4x4Poet said:Weight is also quantifyable. The slightly lighter weight could compensate a little for the higher than stock weight that comes with larger tires and rims. And this weight is sprung weight, so reducing even a pound adds up under motion/force. It's too bad all of us can't afford to go with bling, forged alum rims when we step up to big tires to bring the rim & tire combo weight back closer to stock to ease stress on the hub bearings and trunions. The trunions certainly benefit from any weight reduction though large tires would still increase leverage, the main enemy or trunions. So, lighter weight is a performance advantage, but minimal for sure. And your bumper & winch example is sprung weight– apples to oranges.".

buwahaahahahah!!!Mace said:Sooooo which one is sprung and which one is unsprung?
![]()

AATLAS1X said:Fox, I will have your decals in the mail in the morning............I just posted them in my eBay store. Thanks again...........
Degnol said:Shane, I know you have been ass-deep in LC's for a long time. But I'm glad to see you posting and playing here. Good to have you. I have never been disappointed with anything I bought from you.![]()
A little late, but W-e-l-c-o-m-e
Ed
Oh and my vote is DOT 3, sillycone ain't worth it.

Radd Cruisers said:Nice collection of parts.
I always wanted someone to sell fastener kits kinda like what you have gathered, OEM stuff.
AATLAS1X said:T-100? Wow, are they a direct bolt up?
Thanks Noah.