Part-time 4x4

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate
links, including eBay, Amazon, Skimlinks, and others.

Joined
Nov 16, 2006
Threads
1
Messages
10
I'm trying to end an argument with a friend who is looking at an 80. I told him that if he got a '93-'97 he'd be screwed on gas mileage because you cannot convert them to part-time 4x4 due to some viscous coupling in the transfer case. It would not matter to me because I really love the cruisers. He, however, may have issues with gas mileage. Is this a fact? Thanks for any help in this matter.
 
You're wrong on two points:

1) Any 91-97 can easily be converted to part-time 4wd.

2) The AWD doesn't affect mileage significantly anyway. Plenty of data to back this up. For example, my 91 does no worse mileage-wise than an 88-90 FJ-62, which has the same engine and tranny and is lighter to boot.

Part-time 4wd has its place, but only if you think you'll appreciate the "feel" of rear wheel drive better than AWD.

Curtis
 
Last edited:
Thank you for the reply. That is good to know about the mileage. It sounds like there is no point in making the modification if it doesn't significantly improve mileage. Why not have better traction anyway. If he were to convert, what is required? Would he need to swap cases?
 
That is good to know about the mileage. It sounds like there is no point in making the modification if it doesn't significantly improve mileage.

Have you driven an 80? The AWD is very noticeable; at first I hated it(I have an 82 Hilux as well), and swore I'd change to part time asap. Then it grew on me, and now I love it. (BTW, plenty of threads on whether/when the traction's better, and even whether one might want the center diff. locked on dry pavement).

Like I said, some folks just really want that rear wheel drive feel, same as how Cops hate front wheel drive...

Curtis
 
I actually have not driven an 80. I did have full-time 4x4 on my Land Rover Disco. I liked it. It sounds like it's not worth the money to upgrade. Is that the general opinion?
 
I just checked out the kit. Again, I think the best advice for my friend in the market for an 80 is to leave the drivetrain alone. If the mileage difference is minor, then why bother.
 
I actually have not driven an 80. I did have full-time 4x4 on my Land Rover Disco. I liked it. It sounds like it's not worth the money to upgrade. Is that the general opinion?

1) It's not an upgrade; it's an option.

2) That is the general opinion, but not the unanimous one. Do an advanced search on part time 4wd; it comes up a lot.

Curtis
 
This isn't a tech question, which is why I tacked it on to this thread. What is a reasonable price for a mid 90's 80 Series? My friend will be looking in Atlanta at vehicles that have 100k plus miles on it. Alot of the 80's here are 1 owner soccer moms.
 
PT4wd will have questionable payback vs. expense, IMHO not even close to worth doing.

I don't know about atlanta, but a FJ80 would be ~$4-7k around here, and FZJ80 (93+) ~$7-14k
 
With the Slee kit does it add a 2wd shift function or does everything in the front continue spinning and all they do is take the diff out of the transfer case and add hubs to the front? So does the kit change it into like the older transfercases where nothing is spinning in the front until you shift into 4wd or 4lo?
 
i have a bone stock (with lockers) 96 LX450 in GA i would sell him for 6500, it has a little over 150K on it and in good shape. pm me if you want to know more about it.
 
So does the kit change it into like the older transfercases where nothing is spinning in the front

Correct.

T-case lever still controls hi-lo, but a dash switch (required) controls 2wd vs 4wd. There is no more "differential" in the t-case; it's either all power to the back (front drivetrain bits not turning as long as the hubs are unlocked), or locked power to both the front and the back.

Curtis
 
Back
Top Bottom