For Sale Most recent 200 Series purchase prices

Location

United States

Hi! IF you're willing to share, I thought it might be helpful for the rest of us to better understand what the market prices are for the 200 series (and LX 570 I suppose). I'm personally looking for one, have found a few, and curious what others' purchase prices have been so I can negotiate (or not) properly.

Please share purchase price, year, mileage at purchase, and location (east/west/south, etc...)

Thanks and happy hunting for those also looking.

 

[tacoduck]

Hasn’t that always been the case for the LX against its “competition”? Falling short of similarly priced options that offer more luxury and more performance? I thought most folks bought the LX because it’s a Land Cruiser underneath the luxury bits.

Good point. It’s always been the same engine. It was everything else that was different. Now it’s the same frame, the same engine, etc etc. and 17 gal of useable gas. Clown show. Would love a 30 gal factory tank or a clamshell rear hatch. That hybrid battery is also awful on the lx. Eats all the storage. Most would rather have the hd frame and the v8.

 

[rexington14]

1UR in the GX460 vs 3UR in the 200 series was a clear step up.

Now, there is a tier of Toyota/Lexus powertrain that is just MIA. The flagship LX should have a powertrain differentiator (no, an e-motor doesn't count). Especially when the cost difference between the GX is over $35k. Paying $100k+ and getting a twin turbo V6 that's available in a $35k cheaper vehicle is a pretty hard sell. No wonder GX demand is through the roof comparatively. You gotta be a die hard Cruiser fan to justify the LX.

100 series and GX470 shared the 2UZ, but the original MSRP spread between them both (even inflation adjusted) was much much tighter than $35k+.

 

[Specialeyes]

1UR in the GX460 vs 3UR in the 200 series was a clear step up.

Now, there is a tier of Toyota/Lexus powertrain that is just MIA. The flagship LX should have a powertrain differentiator (no, an e-motor doesn't count). Especially when the cost difference between the GX is over $35k. Paying $100k+ and getting a twin turbo V6 that's available in a $35k cheaper vehicle is a pretty hard sell. No wonder GX demand is through the roof comparatively. You gotta be a die hard Cruiser fan to justify the LX.

100 series and GX470 shared the 2UZ, but the original MSRP spread between them both (even inflation adjusted) was much much tighter than $35k+.

I figured you would point out the 4.6 vs 5.7 on the previous gen GX-LX which is a fair point. The way Toyota has done it this gen is bigger turbos/more boost for more power in the LX. The base LX 600 makes another 60 HP but interestingly the torque is the same compared to the 550. Then they went and added the hybrid battery for another boost in the 700 model.

I just think 200 prices are thru the roof because of two things. First one being the old school types who don't like the new stuff and the second one being the rise in popularity of internet auction sites and social media influence.

 

[akgerman]

Of course, for $35k+ less you can get same powertrain. 464/583 in a. Sequoia. All of them have similar HP and torque as the LX700H and the “TRD performance” ones even has that extra 30 HP to match the 700H

 

[Sajan]

4Runner (base/i-FORCE): $41,570 / 4Runner (i-FORCE MAX): ~$49,270 (TRD Off-Road Premium est.)
Land Cruiser: $59,095
Sequoia: $65,025 (SR5 2WD)
GX 550: $67,735
LX 600: $107,950
LX 700h: $116,685

AI Notes:
The Sequoia is a standout value — it ties the LX 700h on torque (583 lb-ft) and nearly matches it on horsepower (437 vs 457), but at roughly $65k vs $117k.

The LX 600 and GX 550 share the same 479 lb-ft torque figure, but the LX 600 costs ~$40k more and delivers 60 more horsepower — essentially paying a luxury premium for the larger body and three-row cabin.

The Land Cruiser and 4Runner (MAX) are identical on both power figures (326 hp / 465 lb-ft) since they share the same powertrain, but the Land Cruiser starts ~$6,500 higher for its full-time AWD and locking differentials standard.

 

[akgerman]

4Runner (base/i-FORCE): $41,570 / 4Runner (i-FORCE MAX): ~$49,270 (TRD Off-Road Premium est.)
Land Cruiser: $59,095
Sequoia: $65,025 (SR5 2WD)
GX 550: $67,735
LX 600: $107,950
LX 700h: $116,685

View attachment 4150655

AI Notes:
The Sequoia is a standout value — it ties the LX 700h on torque (583 lb-ft) and nearly matches it on horsepower (437 vs 457), but at roughly $65k vs $117k.

The LX 600 and GX 550 share the same 479 lb-ft torque figure, but the LX 600 costs ~$40k more and delivers 60 more horsepower — essentially paying a luxury premium for the larger body and three-row cabin.

The Land Cruiser and 4Runner (MAX) are identical on both power figures (326 hp / 465 lb-ft) since they share the same powertrain, but the Land Cruiser starts ~$6,500 higher for its full-time AWD and locking differentials standard.

I traded my 2019 onyx with Terra and 61k miles for a 2026 sequoia trd pro. Owned the sequoia for 6 months. Dumped it. Been shopping for a 200/lx for 2 months now. My 2019 onyx worth $6k more. Lol. Sequoia is loud. Plasticy. Same space inside essentially as 200 but drives much larger. Hate it. Everyone like me is finding out why we don’t like this new stuff. I will say in the sequoia’s defense. It’s fast. Super fast. Instant speed and torque. But the steering is drive by wire crap and the noise inside is un livable.

 

[rexington14]

I figured you would point out the 4.6 vs 5.7 on the previous gen GX-LX which is a fair point. The way Toyota has done it this gen is bigger turbos/more boost for more power in the LX. The base LX 600 makes another 60 HP but interestingly the torque is the same compared to the 550. Then they went and added the hybrid battery for another boost in the 700 model.

I just think 200 prices are thru the roof because of two things. First one being the old school types who don't like the new stuff and the second one being the rise in popularity of internet auction sites and social media influence.

Bolting on larger turbos and giving LX a more aggressive tune is like the bare minimum thing Toyota could have done to differentiate. Which is fine if that's how they wanted to do it for this gen, but I just don't see how such a minimal move justifies the huge price gap. I know the LX offers a lot more than GX beyond the powertrain. But still. IMO the same twin turbo V6 just doesn't cut it here. Every vehicle I've ever bought the motor I'm getting is top of mind.

 

[Sajan]

Bolting on larger turbos and giving LX a more aggressive tune is like the bare minimum thing Toyota could have done to differentiate. Which is fine if that's how they wanted to do it for this gen, but I just don't see how such a minimal move justifies the huge price gap. I know the LX offers a lot more than GX beyond the powertrain. But still. IMO the same twin turbo V6 just doesn't cut it here. Every vehicle I've ever bought the motor I'm getting is top of mind.

Toyota is trying to figure out how to make engines that won't leak or blow up.. Let's not stress them out right now and ask for larger turbos.

Chill!