This perticular head came off a 2LT that had a roller valve setup. So this was an early 2LT, not a 2LT2 or 2LTE. Now the photos I have seen of the 2LT2 or 2LTE heads shows the same channel and the same divet between the valves so it gives me reason to believe it is the same.
The issue you have with this design is that you have exactly 5.7mm of cast steel seperating one chamber that contains upwards of 500PSI and over 1200F from another chamber that has virtually no pressure and around 220F.
I'm not an engineer but can ask a few friends to do some math for me, and it will likely prove what is pretty obvious, it's a flawed design. There is not enough wall thickness no matter what you do.
This is not a question of what to do so it does not fail, it is simply a question of what might prolong it from failing sooner. It will fail, eventually, if you are nice to it and run Evans you might extend the life of it but it will fail eventually.
Now if we could get to the designers and change the casting it would no longer be an issue. There is no benefit of running a cooling channe. between the valves. There is another just abouve it. If we could stop the channel before it gets to the thin section, and drill a new hole from above to reroute the flow around that section, it would solve that issue.
Now I though about cutting in threads, and putting a plug in there, the issue with that is that the thread cut would make the wall thickness even smaller and a plug, unless it is the exact same material as the head, would expand and contract at different rates and likely cause it to fail even quicker.
So unless we can redo the casting, this is a failure waiting to happen.